yes I agree and I get that perspective … it’s the idea that the arrival destination is the same but there is two different road to get there so we think we choose the destination …or the idea that the guys we see up front is just a muppets regardless of who is in power… I am not saying i totally agree with that premise and everything decisions is the case but to think it is never the case would be foolish.
A bit too stark for my taste. A choice between extreme right and extreme left is not much better than no choice at all. Are there no moderates anymore?
Some, but most are retiring from politics.
Well, that might be true for you, but there’s been a few I’m proud I DID vote for.
... and most are retiring filthy rich on the backs of the taxpayers I might add.
IMO, moderates Stand for nothing.
Right.
Its OK some people have lower standards than others.
Not lower, higher.Its OK some people have lower standards than others.
Hate speech is exactly the speech that the 1st Amendment is meant to protect. Absolutely no reason or need to protect speech that is generally accepted by the public. You don't have to agree with it, you don't have to listen to it if you don't want, but you have no right to ban it. AND that goes for both sides of the spectrum. How do you show the utter idiocy of a stated doctrine unless discourse, argument, and open debate can take place?
This is a forum I visit that I am not a moderator, I think they do a good job. We are talking about volunteers (moderators) using thier own time while still having an interest in the forum content for thier personal enjoyment.
When did this happen??
You do know that the 1st amendment only refers to the government not restricting speech? A private owner can restrict speech in a privately owned forum, business, or anyplace they own.
Was Reagan a really bad president to you? I thought he was real good. Maybe he was before you voted, but he was gold standard to me.
Was born but couldn't vote yet.
