WinterDeere
Super Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,038
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Tractor
- John Deere 3033R, 855 MFWD, 757 ZTrak; IH Cub Cadet 123
Agreed. Buyer and seller were both fine in canceling the sale, and seller offered to make up lost auction fees to the fair. So why is fair stuck in the mud on allowing a harmonious resolution?I can see how the initial events could easily happen with a child in 4H. I was raised in 4H, and in my opinion the Fair Board dropped the ball by not allowing the sale to be reversed (as agreed to by the seller and buyer). It is my understanding that the Fair was offered to be made whole (cut from auction).
The Fair Board should have (at worst) banned the family from auctioning livestock in the future.
The poor sheriff's deputies being sent on a 20 hour round trip to retrieve a goat surely thought this was even more stupid than any of us, but it's their job.The actions of the Sheriff's Dept were ridiculousy over the top for the first attempt to seize the animal, then in violation of the constitution in seizing it at the second location.
Where they screwed up, and cost their taxpayers $300k, was when they didn't drive home after serving the warrant failed. Choosing to exceed the warrant and drive to a second farm where they had no warrant and no jurisdiction, is what likely opened them up to liability.