The big question I have though is about those piles I make; the grapples I've seen seem nice from the relatively light grabbing tool standpoint, but my concern is that most of these have a maximum jaw opening of about 36-39"
As my main use is probably in moving piles of hand-cut brush and branches, I'm most interested in hearing from people who have a similar practice.
Your use for a grapple is very similar to mine. Like you I crush the pile with the grapple before biting into it. A few things to note.
The lid of the grapple will suck some of the pile down into it when closing allowing you to grab more than the opening of the grapple.
I have a brush grapple that is L shaped. These grapples I believe can carry more as they have a higher volume and hold the load straight out.
Below is the grapple I have.
FREE SAME DAY SHIPPING Call for a quote if shipping to Canada, Alaska, or Hawaii. Photos are of a stock grapple, the grapple you receive may have variations depending on the options you choose. Made Entirely with high strength 50,000 psi Steel! Weight: 480 lbs unit 515 lbs shipping Bucket Width...
stoutbuckets.com
An example from another user showing the amount of brush that you can hold forward of the grapple edge with a L shaped grapple. Notice how the tractor is carrying almost as much brush in front of the grapple lip as it is in the grapple.
I want to get a grapple for my 1.5 year old, 300 hours Kubota
B2920. I have made a tentative plan and would like to have it checked. I'm hoping for and am open to all comments, advice, criticisms, alternatives, corrections on any part of the plan big or small. For me, this is a very large...
www.tractorbynet.com
You do not need a grapple as wide as the tractor unless doing lots of grubbing. A narrower grapple is more maneuverable in the woods.
Another point is that when you drive into a pile you compact the pile against the back of the grapple increasing density of the brush that is being moved.
On a good bite I can hold about a 6' pickup truck beds worth of brush in the grapple.
My proposed use of a grapple is also to pick up stuff that I've kinda bulldozed with the bucket - in dense areas I'll push within reason and often manage to uproot quite a bit of brush (especially manzanita, as well as blackberries - piranha tooth bar really grabs stuff well!) and smaller trees and this produces a fairly dense mat of stuff, and currently I end up cutting it up in situ or pull it out by hand to cut up into the above piles. A grapple would likely make this a lot easier by pulling chunks out that I can more easily separate.
The C style rake grapple's hold their load different allowing less volume and any excess is pointed down, requiring a higher carrying position. The opening of a C style rake grapple is also on the bottom meaning any loose brush that is not firmly held by the gripping action of the lid is liable to fall out. The advantage of a C style rake grapple is the ability to use it to grub brush while keeping the bucket cylinders retracted (in their strongest position). Another advantage of a C shape grapple is that it carries the load close to the loader, this is good for heavy logs. To mitigate this with a L shape I will tilt the grapple 90° so it faces the ground then put it over top of the log, I will clamp the log and roll the grapple back while lowing the loader to keep the grapple on the ground. Then once the grapple is fully tilted back (bucket cylinders retracted) I will slightly loosen the grip of the grapple on the log allowing it to slide to the back of the grapple before clamping it tight for transport.
I suspect the fork thumb has the tallest "opening"; that grapple lid probably doesn't open any further than in the pic. Both of these are cheaper, but it seems to me that neither is likely to be very useful in pulling apart a matted pile of trees and shrubs.
The fork type and Log type grapples are best at handling logs. They hold the log to the forks and allow you to grab multiple logs and transport them securely. They are not that great at brush as it is challenging to pick up brush in short pieces or brush that is flexible. The frostbite can move brush and does it well, however it moves very little brush compared to a wider grapple.
As my main use is probably in moving piles of hand-cut brush and branches,
For carrying loose brush I think that the L type brush grapples are the best. I would not worry about only having 36" or less of opening as much of the capacity of an L shaped grapple is outside the grapple when in loose brush. My 32" opening has not left me wanting a wider bite. The L shaped brush grapple also handles smaller piles and short loose brush well as it is held by the floor of the grapple. When cutting a tree up I will delimb it then cut the trunk into firewood rounds, then use the grapple to gather the limbs and carry them to the brush pile. I do not normally stack the limbs unless on the lawn but just tilt the grapple down and drive forward with a pile of limbs forming in the grapple. On occasion I will tilt my grapple down and use it as a root rake and grub trees. However my tractor is an industrial and the loader cylinder rods are 2" diameter so they are much stronger than a compact.
This weekend I am going to grub a new trail through some Multiflora Rose (alot like blackberries) since the backhoe is on the tractor and I do not feel like taking it off to put the brush hog on but need to get back to that side of the property for some work. A C-shaped grapple would be better for this sort of work.
However most of my tasks for a grapple are moving brush piles were a L shape grapple excels. I like a dual lid grapple as it allows you to move awkward items such as stumps more securely with one lid holding the rootball and the other holding the trunk. For light brush a single lid grapple works just as well. A friend has a full length single lid L type brush grapple with a full lid and I used it prior to getting mine. It does a as good of a job in light brush as my dual lid. However I am still partial to the dual lid as it can grab uneven loads better.
Yes, it's for the 3520h.
It can pick up 2000#, but losing 1/2 of that to the grapple wouldn't be pleasant, and having so much weight would make hills more difficult in general.
I'm hoping to be in the 400-500# range.
Do not get to heavy of a grapple, it is not worth loosing your load capacity. My tractor has a 2,800 lb lift so the 480 lb grapple is a little light for it, however the lids are the only thing I worry about (don't backdrag with them). I have moved logs that the tractor could barely lift with its 4,800 lb breakout force and no damage to the grapple, just have to be carefull.
If you are going to get a grapple, and I use mine often on my
BX2680, make sure and put an expanded metal brush guard insert on your front brush guard to protect your radiator. If not it’s not if you will put a limb through the radiator it’s when
Good advice. I did not need one as the entire front of the tractor is 1" thick metal but compacts and ag tractors are not built with hardnose's.
The gripping power and carrying abilities of a grapple increase the capacity immensely compared to forks.
Unfortunately (for me, not society

) I'm practically a hermit.
I wish I could be more of a hermit.