Tx Jim
New Member
GManBart
Trying to convince buickanddeere of something is similar to this :mur:.
Trying to convince buickanddeere of something is similar to this :mur:.
Last edited:
They aren't tractors with no suspension, they aren't run for hours and hours and hours on end at high power settings, and they don't have a useful life of many decades without significant maintenance requirements. To sum it up for you, they don't have to be built to the same level of ruggedness as a tractor requires.
Wow, I can't believe you took a swing at the softball I tossed up there. If you build a gasser to be as rugged, and durable as a diesel tractor engine, or if you take a diesel engine, and modify it for gasoline, you aren't going to be saving any money on the engine...in fact, the cost will go up until they pay off the costs to make those modifications, new tooling, etc. So, you wind up with an equally expensive engine that gets worse fuel economy...significantly worse because you're going to be running it hard, which is where gassers lose even more compared to diesels.
You just seem to miss that diesels are relatively more efficient than gas engines when worked hard....like in a tractor, not a car/truck puttering down the highway using 10% of it's rated power.
To make matters even worse for the gasser, if people using diesel tractors want to, they can usually get off-road diesel (150gal minimum for delivery from my supplier) at a good discount over pump diesel...cutting the gas to diesel cost difference even more.
Really? You should tell them, because they must not be nearly as smart about the industry and market as you are. It's amazing they haven't caught on, and that's what they do for a living.
I thought this discussion was about gasoline CUTs, not what car/truck/SUV somebody wants for their poor wife or kids?
Maybe a tractor manufacturer will decide to make a gasser CUT or SCUT. They'll come up with a new engine design, make the case really beefy since it's part of the structure, oversize all the moving parts so they can handle running at redline indefinitely, make it a DI engine with all the complications that go along with that, develop a whole slew of vibration resistant electrical components, figure out everything needed for the new emissions requirements, come up with a way to make all those new, fancy, electrical components weather resistant, and maybe even do something to limit water retention in the fuel system caused by ethanol being in most readily available gasoline (maybe just a strainer system like airplanes have).
After they're all done with that, they'll have an engine that costs as much to produce as current diesels, makes no more power or torque, and gets worse fuel economy.
I can't imagine why a tractor manufacturer hasn't already jumped all over that idea! :confused2:
O
Are you denying that ULS diesel has cost more than gasoline per btu than gasoline since 2006?
Are you saying the either the diesel or gas Cruze uses more HP to drive down the road 55mph?
Are you saying that Uncle Bubba putting around on his rural estate on his CUT is a HD application?
Are you saying the diesel cruze is cheaper per mile to operate ?
Are you saying that after looking at the Nabraska tests that the diesel burns less fuel in a Light Duty application than a gasser ?
As for MHarryE who is decades behind the times. The DI gasser operates at 14.7 to 1 which is a term called Stoichiometric . In fact the DI will go into a lean burn mode under some circumstances .
What is this talk of combustion occurring 90 degrees after TDC is desirable ? It's too late for efficient mechanical conversion of combustion chamber pressure to torque . Combustion that late just causes over heating as more cylinder wall is exposed to absorb heat. Ever hear tell of a gasser running hit due to retarded timing?
Ideal combustion efficiency occurs as close as possible to TDC when the combustion chamber volume is smallest.
This also gives the entire expansion stroke/power stroke to use combustion chamber pressure.
This is where common rail injection of diesels is a win as the entire load of fuel can be injected over 5 degrees of crank rotation instead of over 45 degrees rotation. Less kick back on the compression stroke as combustion is starting at 5 BTDC instead of 15-20 BTDC.
Are you aware that the DI gasser uses variable cam timing to control airflow ?
Are you aware that when a diesel , boiler fire box of gas turbine is operating at less than 100% power . The excess in throttled airflow reduces engine thermal efficiency by cooling the combustion and carrying heat out the exhaust ? Are you aware that some diesel reciprocation and stationary gas turbine applications throttle the intake to improve efficiency at less than 100% power.
Are you aware that when comparing Two similar engines such as the gas 4020 and the diesel 4020. The torque and HP is near identical? How can you compare the 292 or 350 Chev calmed to make power from 1800-4500rpm to a turbo diesel calmed shorter to make power from 1200-2200rpm?
The EPA mileage tests are an even plying field to obtain and apples to apples comparison of mileage. Who should be believed about a machines performance? Lab techs using calibrated equipment under known repeatable conditions ? Or what some Bubba on the Internet or down at the tavern says his vehicle is getting for mileage?
Read up on the micro particulate the greenies have dreamed up after HC, CO, NOX and CO2 problems were solved. The EPA and the like would be out of a job if they failed to find a new crisis to regulate. Now the new "clean" combined Cycle NG generating plants placed in urban areas are polluting the air right where people live.
What controls that 30,000psi common rail injection system on that modern diesel? I would suspect a computer, yards of wiring harness, actuators and sensors.
There was once upon a time when the diesel ruled supreme in some light, most medium and all HD applications until the EPA had their way until 2007 . Now the diesel has been hamstrung and the gas has taken the lead in the light and into some medium duty applications.
Some people swear allegiance and loyalty to various ideals, corporations, institutions, teams etc. "Diesel" is one of them, it must portray some manly masculine concept or something? Why some people still stand there and defend something that WAS best in the past but has now been superseded is a mystery.
It's not 1969,1972, 1989 or 2006 any more.
I must have missed out. I was talking about technical facts . You are tossing softballs for an ego trip.
I already addressed the market. What people want is not necessarily what is best suited for the application . Who is purchasing bulk quantities of diesel fuel for a CUT?
We have an acquaintance that owns a repair shop that specializes in VWs. When I told him I wanted to look at the TDI's he said "WHY?". His reasoning was this:
They cost more to buy. They cost more to repair. The fuel costs more. And they are slow compared the gas models. The mileage savings wouldn't pay back for 5-6 years (at that current rate of diesel pricing), and that's just to break even. He really wanted to steer me away from the TDI. He's the one that let me test drive the Jetta (gas model). He told me to take it out on the highway and beat on it. It was fun! But too small for me. He suggested a Passat, but he didn't have any and they rarely come up for sale because people tend to hold on to them (both gas and diesel models). I was kind of bummed. Now I'm not sure if he was being honest, or that he only had gas models in stock that he wanted to sell. But he offered to go to the auctions and bring back some Passats if he found any, but since he was discouraging the TDI, I declined. I agree about the small rear seats in the Jetta, too. We have two kids and were carpooling to school, so 5 folks. Wasn't gonna cut it. It would be a good car for a single, a couple or couple with one kid.... a small couple. :laughing:
O
.
.
.
Are you aware that the DI gasser uses variable cam timing to control airflow ?
.
.
.
The conversation IS about the light diesel market in CUT and light highway vehicles.
b&d
Who do you predict will be the 1st tractor manufacturer to market a gasoline tractor if of course a new gasoline powered tractor ever rolls off the assembly line????????????
...
Still stands the gas DI is the cheaper machine to purchase, fuel and service than diesel in the under 50HP equipment range and for light and even some medium duty highway vehicles.