jnelson
Silver Member
I agree with both Hozen and VinceSMTA. Spoolintruck did start out on the wrong foot by jumping into this forum right out of the gate implying big problems with Cub Cadet and asking how many of us have had issues, though he did not reveal the nature of his problem. He also set a very offensive posture by threatening to try force Cub to purchase the tractor back. In subsequent posts the nature of his problem became clear and was even solved, though I don't think his approach to seeking service would endear him with any dealer.
I was one of the first responses to his initial post pointing out the lack of information and tone used. I don't think my post 'bashed' Spoolintruck but maybe he interpreted it that way. I do think that subsequent posts did get more aggressive in tone and there is a tendency for things to get over-analyzed in threads like this.
The most important thing here is the fact that the tractor did get repaired and is now working properly - and with no major potential Cub Cadet defect as implied in the first post. I'm glad Spoolintruck has his tractor running right and can enjoy ownership now.
The second thing this post reveals is the problem and challenge associated with obtaining warranty support from the dealer network after the sale - particularly when the servicing dealer is not the selling dealer. The fact is that the obligations of dealer warranty service are not the same as some people think or expect. And in fairness to the dealers it is hard for them to go above and beyond for someone that purchased elsewhere. In theory it's nice to think that you can get your tractor warranty service anywhere. This concept is probably driven by auto dealers where it is important for no other reason that people travel far from home base in their cars. In most cases it is not even feasible to drive tractors to the closest servicing dealer - they need to be moved by trailer.
Maybe the best response to this thread is to let it go now and for Spoolintruck to start a new thread about a project he has been able to accomplish with his new (and properly running) tractor. And don't forget to include pictures! We all like happy endings, right? :thumbsup:
JN
I was one of the first responses to his initial post pointing out the lack of information and tone used. I don't think my post 'bashed' Spoolintruck but maybe he interpreted it that way. I do think that subsequent posts did get more aggressive in tone and there is a tendency for things to get over-analyzed in threads like this.
The most important thing here is the fact that the tractor did get repaired and is now working properly - and with no major potential Cub Cadet defect as implied in the first post. I'm glad Spoolintruck has his tractor running right and can enjoy ownership now.
The second thing this post reveals is the problem and challenge associated with obtaining warranty support from the dealer network after the sale - particularly when the servicing dealer is not the selling dealer. The fact is that the obligations of dealer warranty service are not the same as some people think or expect. And in fairness to the dealers it is hard for them to go above and beyond for someone that purchased elsewhere. In theory it's nice to think that you can get your tractor warranty service anywhere. This concept is probably driven by auto dealers where it is important for no other reason that people travel far from home base in their cars. In most cases it is not even feasible to drive tractors to the closest servicing dealer - they need to be moved by trailer.
Maybe the best response to this thread is to let it go now and for Spoolintruck to start a new thread about a project he has been able to accomplish with his new (and properly running) tractor. And don't forget to include pictures! We all like happy endings, right? :thumbsup:
JN