Hi OldPilgrim,
I realize it takes a bit of thought to understand this but existing gun laws that have prevented mass shootings have already prevented those shootings.
In order to prevent even more shootings additional laws or greater enforcement of existing laws may be required.
In other words when you say over and over and over again after each comment. "Show me any gun law, past, present or future, that would have prevented any of the mass shootings in this country." You are exercising a faulty sort of debating logic.
Just because non-enforcement or lack of existing laws didn't prevent some mass shootings DOES NOT mean they have not prevented other potential mass shootings.
The plainest examples are when law enforcement have found stockpiles of weapons in the possession of someone who was planning a mass shooting and did not allow the plan to proceed.
So every time you use that tag line you are actually advocating for more gun laws and restrictions.
And, of course, freedom turns out to always come at a cost. You may want others to pay for it, but that's another topic.