Farmwithjunk
Super Member
DaryleD said:Here again, it is opinion. I use to weld for a living as well. That does not make me an expert on welding helmets, nor does it make any experienced welder an expert on them unless he or she has done some real research. What it does mean is that we can weld and know something about joining metal. I am not saying that a welder doesn't know their job; they do if they are worth their "metal" ( pun intended ). I had the oportunity to use both and never felt like my eyes had been even stressed ( we didn't get the auto darkening helmets until about a year or so before layoffs and final closing, but they were used for 8-12hrs. a day ). I also, like I said, thought as you and Bil do on this UNTIL I thought it through after reading the article and remembering back a few years. The welders that I ran were in a foundry and were big units with gouging feature that we used as well. I know there are alot of false statements made in the process of selling things sometimes, but I do think that things are looked at a little more closely when safety is concerned ( from the powers that be in our govt. ). I guess we'll probably always have something to talk about with this one. Is there anyone who knows of an independent lab to test this sort of stuff??
Daryle.
I'm sticking with what I KNOW works. There is plenty of test data supplied by the manufacturers of these hoods that claim all is well. I've heard plenty from people who've used them with mixed revue. I have a good hood with a conventional lens that I'm 100% happy with. No need to explore new territory.
As far as saftey testing. I can recall when asbestos was the greatest thing since sliced bread. All positive and NO negative issues with it. Now take a look at it. Even the best make mistakes.
Until ALL the issues are resolved, I'm standing pat with my old technology on this one.