it's not like you have a limit on how many images you can have on here, so what would be the benefit of removing old images (unless they are misleading or factually incorrect)?
Aaron Z
I remove the few photos that I consider unnecessary
and that had very few views following some initial interest. Here's one I posted in 2004 that's marginal, very few views ever, but I haven't deleted it. The discussion was Yanmar's unusual 'Tree Frog Green' used in the 1970's, and this is a photo of re-opening an abandoned ravine terrace. There have been many subsequent threads on the topic of this paint color, so my photo is now less important than it was 18 years ago. I doubt it will get many views in the future.
I've preserved this as my remembrance of an interesting project, but I doubt it adds much value to the site by now.
An example of a photo removed was one with a heavy chain between the steering wheel and clutch pedal, for security back when the ranch cabin was rented to college students. I feared some guest would do a 'I used to drive tractors, hold my beer and watch this!'. Anybody could devise similar security. After no increase in views over subsequent years, I purged it.
I have 400+ photos here and digging through that many to illustrate a point, is plenty.
Xfaxman 22 thousand? How do you find anything?
[Note the photo above was shrunk for this post as described recently, by dragging a red corner flag in the draft. Clicking while viewing will restore its size.]