I don't have standing to take a position on this (other than taking the opportunity to high jack an interesting thread).
1. I know a lot of gear is turbo'd.
2. Other folks (me) have had crappy experience with different tech, turbo in this case. I had two late 80 early 90 cars ford, and Nisan both had turbo failures prior to 100k. Now I know they are probably poor representations of heavy equipment, and modern equipment, but, I do buy normally aspired equipment exclusively now, so the bias stuck right or wrong.
3. Those to get to this
Assuming you don't live at high altitude. What is the upside of a turbo in a fairly low use 60 or 70 horse tractor? I understand in applications that need more power with less displacement/weight, but I always wish my tractor was heavier not lighter. I am always grateful for easier access, simpler engines. But, I am old and still willing to learn, my next purchase will probably be a replacement skid (bobcat 773) and in addition to tires vs tracks, will be deciding normal aspire vs turbo.
In order, thanks in advance for the opinions, sorry if this is too much of a hi-jack, and it is a genuine question, not trying to fuel a fuss, honestly don't see the upside.
Best,
ed