And you CAN use a GFI recep. on a MWBC.
I stand corrected.
True. But, with limitations. No pass through.
And you CAN use a GFI recep. on a MWBC.
Curious how much money such a circuit might save. That's the reason for doing it am I right? Or is there improved function of some kind? Don't see why a KISS circuit couldn't be used why the complexity.
I'm trying to understand the savings in quantitative terms. Maybe $400 materials? And 4 hours of electrician time @ $100/hr? So savings in the range of $1000? Cost of construction @ $100-$150 per sq ft = $200-$300k for a 2000 sq ft home. So a very rough estimate of savings might be 0.5% of the cost of construction? I am thinking of the trade-off between saving the electrician some time and materials up front, against maybe 5 decades of dealing with the somewhat inconvenient and possibly dangerous consequences identified by commenters.
It's like pros that still use 14 ga for 15 amp circuits.
Each circuit needs its own neutral.
Less chance for problems if every circuit has it's own neutral. No shared neutral circuits. BTW, almost all circuits are designed to run at 80% max current. 15 amp breaker = 12 amps, 20 amp breaker = 16 amps.
Code has evolved to the point where you cannot mix lighting circuits with outlets (GFCI, arc fault, etc.). Given we now have dedicated lighting circuits, 14ga wire on 15a breakers is fine...as LED continues to evolve, even that will be over-kill.Knowing the electricity demands today, I can't see anyone who has a conscience, using 14 gauge for any new construction.
They used a lot of 14 gauge around here in the 80's. Most of it was installed with push in connections on the switches, and receptacles.
After 30+ years of use, the connection is often so bad, you can pull the wire out of the back, without much difficulty.