newbury
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2009
- Messages
- 14,177
- Location
- From Vt, in Va, retiring to MS
- Tractor
- Kubota's - B7610, M4700
Yes it did.I knew it, an angry old man that can't stand to see anyone with a few dollars benefit from FEMA. Income should not be a deciding factor, as to who is and is not entitled to FEMA. I was just talking to a friend who's neighbor lost his home and a restaurant on the shore. Both completely destroyed. Judging by last years income, he will not be entitled to get any help from FEMA, but he no longer has an income. How can this possibly be fair?
I'm sure this story improved Newbury's mood quite a bit more.
If your "friends neighbor" had that much money he should have had insurance and not need to collect from FEMA. I'm writing about wealthy people who knew they were in a danger area and did not get insurance they could afford because they relied on FEMA to cover their butt.
Hopefully no life was lost BUT his story will get spread around and those that choose to have possessions in known danger zones will get them insured at their expense.