Millnturn
New member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
- Messages
- 13
- Location
- Kalispell, MT
- Tractor
- John Deere 318, TORO Groundsmaster 325D
That is why you use one size larger QD.
It would be easy enough to test.
Connect a full set of QD to a hose and place in a 5 gal bucket and measure the flow,
Then remove the QD and place the hose in a bucket and measure the flow.
I don't believe you will see a big difference.
That's not a valid test of flow restriction in a hydraulic system with a fixed displacement pump (gear, vane, piston, etc). Setup your test as you described, but add pressure gauges before and after the QD, or better yet, a differential pressure gauge. The effect QD's produce is pressure drop, which increases with flow rate. The flow rate will not change (or, by a negligible amount) until you reach a level of back pressure that exceeds system relief pressure or you slow/stall your prime mover (engine).
Besides a reduction in performance of the system downstream of the QD, another downside is heat. Pressure drop x flow = heat input to system. A hydraulic system, under the right conditions (dumping full flow across relief valve), will produce a tremendous amount of heat into the oil. A system driven by a 20 hp engine has the potential to generate around 15,000 watts of heat under those conditions! Just some food for thought when considering the effects of fluid conductor sizing and pressure drop.