Sorry (to LB) I couldn't resist. i'm usually a dead serious, no nonsense guy, but the irony drew me in like a moth to a flame.jwstewar said:Good one Theo. I was thinking the same thing.Except multiple tanks makes more sense.
Theo
Sorry (to LB) I couldn't resist. i'm usually a dead serious, no nonsense guy, but the irony drew me in like a moth to a flame.jwstewar said:Good one Theo. I was thinking the same thing.Except multiple tanks makes more sense.
Understood but they will be in different vehicles.J0be269 said:Seriously, LB did bring up one good point. I'm assuming the tanks are residing in the bed of a truck or on a trailer most of the time. If they are pretty close to each otheryou could alway elevate one tank an inch or two higher than the other. Then come up with a way to connect the two tanks at their lowest points. This was your higher tank (without pump) would completly drain into your lower tank (with pump). Would give you the incrased capacity without the need for moving the pump.
As above, two different trucks with one in each truck.AlanB said:Are the tanks physically close to each other or is it something like a tank in your truck and a tank at the house?
In the petroleum world (that sounds wrong) but it is commonly done with Camlocks and hoses. Might need to build a little skid or something for your pump (we have one we keep on a handtruck) and then just put appropriate ends on your stuff.
I am probably spelling the name wrong, but you can look down the list here
Fuel & Energy Classifieds in Moreno Valley, Auctions, and Sales near Moreno Valley, California
and see several versions etc. of Camlocks. An industrial hose house should have them on the shelf in various sizes and configurations to meet your needs, there are also caps etc. available easily.
That is not a bad idea although I would have to replumb the filter to enable it to unscrew like that. can you elaborate on this hose coupling you use? thanks.DrRick said:I just unscrew the pump and change it to the other tank. I did put a QD plastic coupler on the hose ( the black banjo fittings ) his makes unscrewing the unit a lot easier.
JDeereman said:As above, two different trucks with one in each truck.
Theo
Yep, we talked about that option. makes a lot of sense too since the pump is not needed for fill-ups. why haul that pump and hose all over creation when it is only needed back on the farm.AlanB said:Then camlock and cap the ends, and small transfer hoses and a pump on a skid.
Not necessary but thanks for the offer. We get the concept having discussed it before including advantages and disadvantages of full remove and store concept. i'm just not ready to throw in the towel yet on the quick switchable mount idea. if we can find the right parts for that approach to work and be secure and leak tight on the truck, it would still be our first preference.AlanB said:I don't have the camera with me, but could probably do it tomorrow if you want to see what we did.