The 2610 is a very nice tractor and there are a couple of advantages over the 2410. The extra horsepower is nice and the other advantage is the tractor hours are measured at a higher RPM so the warranty will last longer. For example if a 2410 and a 2610 were both running at 2000 RPM the hours display on the 2610 will move slower. Not a big advantage but if you use the tractor a lot your warranty will last longer on the 2610.
Bmarian,
Lots of good info in your post! About the hour meter on GC, I believe both models (and most current tractors) use a electronic hourmeter, not a mechanical (cable driven) hour meter. While the meter on the GC is analog (not a LCD), it is electrically driven. When the keyswitch is in the On position, the hour meter runs, regardless if the engine on actually running or not. Because the meter is electrically driven, I don't believe it receives any input (variable voltage) related to rpm, the hours accrue at the same rate regardless of engine speed.
I can add one other perspective on choosing between the 24x0 and the 26x0. Based on the manuals and my dealer, the two are virtually identical except for the engine speed at pto rpm. A perspective buyer needs to weigh the pros and cons of each before making a decision. Based on the GC manual the 24x0 is rated as 18.7hp@555pto rpm and the 26x0 is rated at 19.6hp@572pto rpm. The manual also specifies engine speed at 540 PTO rpm of 2532 vs 2829. This makes for about a 12% difference in engine speed for any given pto rpm.
So the trade off is the GC26x0 give you about 0.9 more pto hp but you will need to run a GC26x0 about 12% faster during any PTO operation to get a similar pto shaft speed as the GC24x0. The GC26x0 also provides about 9.5% more hydraulic flow (6.9gpm vs 6.3gpm) which might be useful if you every want to run something like a hydraulic log splitter with the Power Beyond.
One interesting point when I bought my machine. While the dealer recommended the GC2410 for my uses, he said if I ever needed the extra rpm of the 2600, he could change the 2400 to run at 2600 speed in about 10 minutes. He said the engines were identical except for the max speed at which they are set to.
For me the lower engine speed of the 2400 was worth the trade of 0.9pto hp. Since I run a pto backup generator, pto hp was a very important consideration, but it was not enough of a difference to overcome the higher rpms needed.
I agree with you 100%, either GC is a great machine. Buy one and be happy:thumbsup: