rswyan
Super Star Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2004
- Messages
- 11,408
- Location
- Northeast Ohio
- Tractor
- Kubota B2910, Cub Cadet Pro Z 154S, Simplicity 18 CFC, Cub Cadet 782
Cowboy,
Thanks.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I guess that combination could qualify as laminated. When I hear laminated in relation to beams and posts I think of Micro or parallam which is a whole different animal than what your are describing. )</font>
Yup - they call it "nail-laminated"
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( On a personal note...I would prefer a single member situation for at least my primary (4 corners & intermediates as needed based on structure size) supports. )</font>
Any particular reason ? Cleary touts the laminated posts as being stronger than a solid post. (The order of strength is a spliced nail-laminated post being the weakest and is what Morton supposedly uses, with a soild post post being next, and continous nail-laminated being the strongest)
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Having only limited experience with heaving conditions I would probably want a foundation around the perimeter of the slab. )</font>
Yeah .... I'm still trying to research this to find out what is workable for me in this climate .... obviously I don't want to spend a bunch of money and then wind up with a floor that cracks and heaves badly. If anyone with experience in this area of the country wants to chime in I'm sure the original poster and I would be all ears.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( One cost cutting measure might be to build the entire footing and stemwall, then ( if the area is large enough to justify) pour a third of the floor now, a third next year and a third the following year. You're going to need to saw cut the slab any way, so a cold joint would accomplish the same thing and might make the cost a little more tolerable. Just leave a little wire and rebar exposed to let you tie in the new pour. In the mean time you could lay DOT gravel in the area that will get poured later. You shouldn't even have to take up the gravel. Just compact it over time. This should give you a nice base.
)</font>
That would definitely reduce the initial, immediate outlay (if not the eventual cost) .... I'd probably be inclined to pour two (of the three) bays initially .... simply because of what I need to store and because one of the areas would be the repair shop.
Thanks.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I guess that combination could qualify as laminated. When I hear laminated in relation to beams and posts I think of Micro or parallam which is a whole different animal than what your are describing. )</font>
Yup - they call it "nail-laminated"
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( On a personal note...I would prefer a single member situation for at least my primary (4 corners & intermediates as needed based on structure size) supports. )</font>
Any particular reason ? Cleary touts the laminated posts as being stronger than a solid post. (The order of strength is a spliced nail-laminated post being the weakest and is what Morton supposedly uses, with a soild post post being next, and continous nail-laminated being the strongest)
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Having only limited experience with heaving conditions I would probably want a foundation around the perimeter of the slab. )</font>
Yeah .... I'm still trying to research this to find out what is workable for me in this climate .... obviously I don't want to spend a bunch of money and then wind up with a floor that cracks and heaves badly. If anyone with experience in this area of the country wants to chime in I'm sure the original poster and I would be all ears.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( One cost cutting measure might be to build the entire footing and stemwall, then ( if the area is large enough to justify) pour a third of the floor now, a third next year and a third the following year. You're going to need to saw cut the slab any way, so a cold joint would accomplish the same thing and might make the cost a little more tolerable. Just leave a little wire and rebar exposed to let you tie in the new pour. In the mean time you could lay DOT gravel in the area that will get poured later. You shouldn't even have to take up the gravel. Just compact it over time. This should give you a nice base.
)</font>
That would definitely reduce the initial, immediate outlay (if not the eventual cost) .... I'd probably be inclined to pour two (of the three) bays initially .... simply because of what I need to store and because one of the areas would be the repair shop.