Ford Rant

   / Ford Rant #41  
i prefer manual shifters and locking hubs too. my '95 toyota 4x4 truck had this. my '04 Z71 has the push button and while it has never given me any trouble, im still not a huge fan of it.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#42  
RayH said:
Let me guess, your old Jeep had Quadratrac right?

No. Full manual transfer case. Straight back to 4wd, back, over and up for 4 low.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#43  
RoyJackson said:
I don't see what you mean by "ill will" being genetrated by the automotive companies in the 70's and 80's. They built some nice, if not memorable cars then...well, look at the early 70's Mustangs and Chevelles, both collector's cars now. But Ford, GM and Chrysler provided decent transportation.

Geez Roy, did you read anything I said about my '76 Cherokee? How would that experience not generate ill will? Same with my Dad's Fury III and Ford Ranch Wagon. Pure, unadulterated rolling junk. I'm not saying there were no good cars from the '70s, but there sure were a lot of bad ones.

That is what the Japs took advantage of. Remember laughing at those first tiny little Hondas and Chevy Luv pickups? I do.

Edit: And for what it's worth, at the time I thought my Cherokee (faults and all) was really cool. Four wheel drive trucks were much less common in those days. I was 19 or 20. It was roomy. And truth be told, I still think it was and is a great looking vehicle.
 
   / Ford Rant #44  
George,

Per your idea about something on the button. How about a thumb tack?

:)

Chuck
 
   / Ford Rant #46  
N80 said:
Geez Roy, did you read anything I said about my '76 Cherokee? How would that experience not generate ill will? Same with my Dad's Fury III and Ford Ranch Wagon. Pure, unadulterated rolling junk. I'm not saying there were no good cars from the '70s, but there sure were a lot of bad ones.

Yep, I read it all. One person's opinion of a vehicle that was actually pretty popular. One person's opinion does not make a vehicle or design "bad".

To be fair, the early Cherokees did have teething problems in the first years of production. Since Jeep bought a lot of the components used from other manufacturers (the levers on the steering columm where identical to my Chevy S-10's), I'd guess they had integration problems. I know my mother's Cherokee (a 79, I think) was a nice reliable vehicle, although I personnally never cared much for Cherokees...too narrow and a bit tippy. But that design (of the Cherokee) has been around for a lot of years now with millions of satisfied customers.

The only real dog from the 70's (that I recall) was when GM tried to make a diesel out of the 350 gas engine. That cost savings concept cost GM a lot of money. Once they put a real diesel (6.2 liter) out, the reliability problems went away (although I thought the engine was underpowered and not a good fit for an automatic transmission).

N80, all I'm saying is your complaints about a given vehicle doesn't make the vehicle design junk or have created widespread ill will among the customer base. You're basing your critique upon 30 year old memories.

Anyway, this rant has gone on long enough...for me, anyway.
 
   / Ford Rant #47  
Gotta disagree about the only dog being the attempt to make the 350 a diesel. There was the not-very-durable aluminum block Vega, the Monza that required raising the engine off it's mounts to change spark plugs, the prone-to-engine-fires Fiero (ok, this was early 80s)....and those are just the ones I personally know of from GM.

Chrysler had the K-cars, with K standing for kra--y, Ford the exploding Pinto, and who can forget AMC's aptly named Gremlin.
 
   / Ford Rant #48  
A '79 Cherokee would be an SJ - a "full size jeep" like the wagoneer. Nice design, but terrible execution. In its favor, everything is nicely tucked up underneath compared to pickup based SUVs (the Jeep pickup was based on the SUV, not the otherway around).

The XJ Cherokee was first sold in '84. Completely different animal, and much better built and more reliable (with the exception of the ones with the 2.8 V6 from GM).
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#49  
RoyJackson said:
Yep, I read it all. One person's opinion of a vehicle that was actually pretty popular. One person's opinion does not make a vehicle or design "bad".

Roy, it really boils down to this: The truck was a dog. I had friends that had them, they were dogs. It did have redeeming qualities, but it was still poorly made and the quality of virtually all AMC vehicles was legendary....in a bad way. But Roy, I said that the American automakers generated a lot of ill will. That's pretty much a point of historical reference. My one opinion and yours has little bearing on that. The quality of American vehicles, particularly AMC and Dodge/Chrysler was at an all time nadir and did not improve until driven to do so by the imports. You can lapse nostalgic all you wish, but it won't change this fact.

To be fair, the early Cherokees did have teething problems in the first years of production.

Roy, the Cherokee had its teething problems in the late sixties and early 70's. By 76 this vehicle had been around plenty long enough to get past 'teething' problems. Now it sounds like you are just making excuses. And I'm not real sure why. We bought ours on the recommendation of a close friend who had a 72 that was a pretty good truck. His next one was a dog. His full sized Jeep pick-up was a dog. His next vehicle was an import. My best friend in med school had 2 Wagoneers. We spent our weekends working on them....constantly.

I personnally never cared much for Cherokees...too narrow and a bit tippy. But that design (of the Cherokee) has been around for a lot of years now with millions of satisfied customers.

With all due respect Roy, I'm starting to think you don't know what you are talking about. The Cherokee was a huge, very wide, low and very stable 4x4. You are clearly thinking about the later models, the small ones. I don't know anything about them but I've specified continuously that I'm talking about the 1970's. AMC. No little Cherokees in the 1970's. That started maybe about 82 or 83.

The only real dog from the 70's (that I recall) was when GM tried to make a diesel out of the 350 gas engine.

OMG. You have got to be kidding. You can only think of ONE dog from the 70's?!?! Roy, the 70's is the decade of the American junk car. As other have mentioned, anyone can rattle off a long list of not just bad but laughably bad cars from the 70's and early 80's. It's comedian material man. Where have you been?

N80, all I'm saying is your complaints about a given vehicle doesn't make the vehicle design junk or have created widespread ill will among the customer base. You're basing your critique upon 30 year old memories.

Hmmm. So my 30 year old memories are the source of the shame of the American automakers in the 70's. I'm pretty sure, at this point, that my 30 year old memories might be based in a little more reality than yours.

But relax Roy. I never even brought up any of this stuff. I simply said my otherwise good Ford truck had one element of undeniably bad ergonomic implementation. You'd have thought, from responses like yours, that I'd baked the flag in an apple pie and hit my mom in the face with it at a baseball game.
 
   / Ford Rant #50  
Like I wrote, N80...I've "spoke" my piece...think what you want to. This thread's going in circles now.
 
Last edited:

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2022 FORD F-150 XL EXT CAB TRUCK (A51406)
2022 FORD F-150 XL...
MCELROY PIPE FUSION MACHINE (A52472)
MCELROY PIPE...
2003 Mercedes-Benz SLK Coupe (A50324)
2003 Mercedes-Benz...
378807 (A51572)
378807 (A51572)
2020 Peterbilt 520 Truck (A51692)
2020 Peterbilt 520...
2010 Ford Edge SE SUV (A51694)
2010 Ford Edge SE...
 
Top