Rolando
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2004
- Messages
- 586
- Location
- Northcentral Florida
- Tractor
- Bobcat Toolcat High Flow Turbo C-series
Well, I was almost ready to take delivery of my B3030 cab when I discovered the <font color="green">Bobcat Toolcat</font> (I know, it's been out for over two years, I'm slow). By chance, I was looking at the B3030 posts in this forum on Friday to read what people were saying about it and I came across this <font color="blue">Post</font> by Steve ("odleefs"). Yes, Steve, in case you should wonder into this section of the discussion boards, you're to blame.... and thanks!!!
Now, all the conclusions I had reached and held for many months about the machine I wanted, have been shaken and I would appreciate your thoughts/reactions/comments on my rationale.
My needs have always been for a machine that I could use to take down some smallish trees and clear off my building site, move and place fill for the house, move construction materials during the building of the house, then after the house was built, mowing and small projects. With the mowing obviously being the prominent long term use.
I should say I'm new to this, so I figured if I needed to move dirt, mow, knock down trees, etc., I needed some kind of tractor with an FEL, and I restricted myself to that category without realizing that there might be something else out there. I initially started looking at the L3130 because its LA-723 FEL had the capacity I felt I needed. But I rejected that tractor because it would be too heavy for my long term mowing needs, and too much tractor for my 5 acre lot.
I then found out about the B3030 and liked being able to get the A/C cab. I was concerned that the FEL capacity was too low, but the tractor was light enough to be able to mow without damaging the grass and I figured this was my best compromise. But the lack of loader capacity kept nagging at me.
Then I started looking at the Toolcat. It has an even better lift capacity than the LA723 and while it weights more than the L3130, the all-wheel steering and the viscous connection between the two axles let it make sharp turns without damaging the grass. And I could still get the air conditioned cab!
The Toolcat costs a lot more than the B3030 cab, but I had already decided that I would also want a utility vehicle to be able to tool around the 5 acres. With the Toolcat, I wouldn't need the Ute, and when I add the cost of the B3030 and the utility vehicle together, the Toolcat won't cost much more and I would end up with only one piece of equipment to maintain.
It seems to me that the main things I loose in going away from a tractor are ground clearance, the 3PH, and the PTO. But my lot is very flat and has no underbrush, it's very dry. You can actually walk through the whole property right now without my having done any clearing or cutting. Ground clearance is just not an issue. The 3PH I would only need for a box blade, and I can get a box blade to go on the FEL of the Toolcat, and this arrangement has the advantage of not having to cran your neck around to the back to see what's going on. The work is right in front of you. The PTO I only needed for mowing grass, and again I can get a 6 ft. mowing deck to attach up front with an easy excellent view of what I'm cutting and that will run off of hydraulics. The Toolcat can turn inside a 17 ft. diameter with the 4-wheel steering, so the mowing should be just as maneuverable as with a belly mower. It looks to me that for my purposes I'm not loosing anything. Everything will now attach at the front, but with everything, including the box blade and the mower, on the skid-steer quick-attach, switching will be simple. By the way, the Toolcat has a Kubota diesel!
Now that I'm looking at it from a different perspective, I also see other advantages to the Toolcat. I don't have a tractoring background, so I think I will feel more at home more quickly with the truck-like feel of the Toolcat verses the tractor position. Also, that truck bed will come in handy to haul tools and things around, and as others have mentioned in other posts about the Toolcat, with the young granddaughter and two dogs that I have, that passenger seat in the enclosed cab looks very attractive. I know they would all vote (with hands or paws) for being able to ride with me as I work and I would enjoy being able to take them.
So there you have it. Am I talking myself into something, or does my reasoning make sense? Sorry about the long post, but I wanted to organize my thoughts as much for myself as for your consideration.
Now, all the conclusions I had reached and held for many months about the machine I wanted, have been shaken and I would appreciate your thoughts/reactions/comments on my rationale.
My needs have always been for a machine that I could use to take down some smallish trees and clear off my building site, move and place fill for the house, move construction materials during the building of the house, then after the house was built, mowing and small projects. With the mowing obviously being the prominent long term use.
I should say I'm new to this, so I figured if I needed to move dirt, mow, knock down trees, etc., I needed some kind of tractor with an FEL, and I restricted myself to that category without realizing that there might be something else out there. I initially started looking at the L3130 because its LA-723 FEL had the capacity I felt I needed. But I rejected that tractor because it would be too heavy for my long term mowing needs, and too much tractor for my 5 acre lot.
I then found out about the B3030 and liked being able to get the A/C cab. I was concerned that the FEL capacity was too low, but the tractor was light enough to be able to mow without damaging the grass and I figured this was my best compromise. But the lack of loader capacity kept nagging at me.
Then I started looking at the Toolcat. It has an even better lift capacity than the LA723 and while it weights more than the L3130, the all-wheel steering and the viscous connection between the two axles let it make sharp turns without damaging the grass. And I could still get the air conditioned cab!
The Toolcat costs a lot more than the B3030 cab, but I had already decided that I would also want a utility vehicle to be able to tool around the 5 acres. With the Toolcat, I wouldn't need the Ute, and when I add the cost of the B3030 and the utility vehicle together, the Toolcat won't cost much more and I would end up with only one piece of equipment to maintain.
It seems to me that the main things I loose in going away from a tractor are ground clearance, the 3PH, and the PTO. But my lot is very flat and has no underbrush, it's very dry. You can actually walk through the whole property right now without my having done any clearing or cutting. Ground clearance is just not an issue. The 3PH I would only need for a box blade, and I can get a box blade to go on the FEL of the Toolcat, and this arrangement has the advantage of not having to cran your neck around to the back to see what's going on. The work is right in front of you. The PTO I only needed for mowing grass, and again I can get a 6 ft. mowing deck to attach up front with an easy excellent view of what I'm cutting and that will run off of hydraulics. The Toolcat can turn inside a 17 ft. diameter with the 4-wheel steering, so the mowing should be just as maneuverable as with a belly mower. It looks to me that for my purposes I'm not loosing anything. Everything will now attach at the front, but with everything, including the box blade and the mower, on the skid-steer quick-attach, switching will be simple. By the way, the Toolcat has a Kubota diesel!
Now that I'm looking at it from a different perspective, I also see other advantages to the Toolcat. I don't have a tractoring background, so I think I will feel more at home more quickly with the truck-like feel of the Toolcat verses the tractor position. Also, that truck bed will come in handy to haul tools and things around, and as others have mentioned in other posts about the Toolcat, with the young granddaughter and two dogs that I have, that passenger seat in the enclosed cab looks very attractive. I know they would all vote (with hands or paws) for being able to ride with me as I work and I would enjoy being able to take them.
So there you have it. Am I talking myself into something, or does my reasoning make sense? Sorry about the long post, but I wanted to organize my thoughts as much for myself as for your consideration.