No, what's that?
Many of us here have posted a myriad of repair questions and received great answers and advice, which has been invaluable to me - and I'm sure to others as well.
Are you suggesting that we abandon doing so because of how it will look when collectively assembled by a search engine? I hope not.
I you read what I posted, you will see I did not suggest that.
Please read this post, I will be as clear as possible this time.
Again, I only suggested that a thread, (that would be this one), that possibly ends up as a list of every repair done to these tractors, without people explaining the circumstances, (that would be the reasons), could appear as a laundry list of breakdowns, to a potential buyers, looking for information on one of these tractors. With this potential to do much more harm than good, I am simply cautioning those who do not realize, that sometimes people take posts differently than they are intended. Your reaction to mine is an example of that.
Again, as I have posted, I am NOT suggesting people do not discuss break downs, problems, or fixes, in the context that they happen.
I am not as concerned about Agco's bottom line, as ours. We are already have some disadvantage in the used market, because Kubota has brand recognition in subcompacts, that MF will never have. Once a piece of equipment gets a negative reputation, deserved or not, it affects the price of it. We don't need to unnecessarily contribute to one.