Funny; our agent visited when we bought the place, despite the fact that we were and are insured by the carrier that insured the prior owner. Over the years, I have let them know the upgrades that were done to improve fire resistance. The only one that we haven't done is interior sprinklers due to a long standing local ordinance requiring black iron pipe that I know will corrode with our water. (And therefore leak...)
Our local fire department has come by to check on how we are doing for compliance, and I work hard to keep them in the loop as well. However, given the terrain and likely inability to retreat from defending our home, I know that they won't defend it. My uphill neighbor with a tile roof and limestone walls, with easy retreat lines and an area for helicopter landings is the ideal staging and command point, and was for our last big fire.
Still, policy rules are often set nationally based on the actuarial losses that the carrier is seeing, and in some locations, expects to see. From what I read, carriers are getting quite sophisticated at understanding what factors drive losses, and, I suspect, increased computer analytics (aka AI) is going to both drive down residual human biases, and favoritism. I do not look forward to being dropped, but it would not surprise me if it happens, and I won't take it personally.
All the best,
Peter