Big Barn
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 6,874
- Location
- Victoria, B C
- Tractor
- More than 40 over the years. Ten at any one time. Mostly Ford and New Holland
The reported California case (person that died Feb 9 had CV19) does not say what the person died from, only that the tissue sample tested positive for CV19. If I recall correctly, they died at home. What was the cause of death?
It's not NYC. It's California. My kid and her fiancé have had contact with someone that was in that area of California back then, and now that person and his fiancé have both been confirmed with the virus. And I've had contact with my kid and her fiancé in that timeframe. So yeah, it's effecting me personally, and I would have liked a link, not a lecture.
The reported California case (person that died Feb 9 had CV19) does not say what the person died from, only that the tissue sample tested positive for CV19. If I recall correctly, they died at home. What was the cause of death?
I thought the point of the article was this person had CV19 well before anyone thought CV19 was a big issue. As of January 21, Fauci was saying, "This is not a major threat threat to the people in the United States and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about." Link
Sorry if you took my comment that way, it wasn't my intent. Its simply curiosity. I naturally dig down into sources to learn more. I agree this thread isn't a place to challenge someone or bring an attitude.Cali, I think the links are already out there in this thread.
We閾エe been sticking to anecdotal comments in this thread so Ié��ï½¥ not throwing è*�æ“�nks out to back up every comment like used to be done in FP.
I trust you豎*e not going to bring that same attitude into this thread.
TBS