dirttoys
Platinum Member
I acknowledge it is sub-optimal it specific instances, by and large I stand by believing it is better to have than not. I am an old guy and would rather drive myself, but, for leadership she is 100% better off with it.The first winter I had my new 1983 Ranger some friends wanted me to go cross country skiing with them. I bought a pair of skiis, and let them navigate as we went to the ski area. I knew that we were in the wrong place as soon as we pulled into the parking lot... I was driving the only pickup in the lot. We were at the downhill slopes, and needed to be on the x-country trails a few miles away.
I hate all of the above, especially ABS. If one side of the vehicle is on snow and the other is on pavement you may as well not have brakes. After doing about $350 worth of front end damage -at 2002 prices- because my '98 GMC wouldn't stop, I disabled it. It's amazing how much better it stopped in snow; rather than rolling along the top like a kid's sled, pumping the brakes would allow the tires to cut through the snow to the pavement and stop.
One day I was driving through town and a motorist was waiting to pull out of a parking lot. He made eye contact, and pulled right out in front of me. I was into the brakes and stopped in less distance than the tables we learned in driver's ed. With ABS I'd have had hit him for sure. Because it wasn't working I avoided the accident but if I had hit him, I would have been considered at fault.
I couldn't begin to guess how many times I've been negotiating deep snow and had the TC kick in while trying to negotiate a hill.
When that happens you may as well get out the snow shovel.
Best,
ed