riptides
Super Star Member
Those who use the pen and pencil sre high maintenance.
Those who use the pen and pencil sre high maintenance.
Decades ago when I was working in the apple orchard they hired someone to help with the pruning. He has grown up with money, but at the time was living in a one room cabin with a hand pump out front. The owner was talking about buying a new mower which could get under the trees. Darryl, the new guy couldn't understand why they would pay $1100 for a machine when people could do it with a scythe?
it just so happened that there was a row of trees with raspberries growing up underneath so that spring they handed him a scythe and told him to have at it. After about two days he allowed how maybe a piee of machinery might be a good thing, after all.
\The question on the table though is, as things get more and more automated and jobs get shipped overseas how do the people make a living who once held those jobs?
Like it or not, it isn't everybody who is cut out to be am IT person or a doctor.
This problem is the reason there is a movement for a 'basic income' - google it.
Overall this country (if not most of the world) had enough wealth we could all be rich, er, well paid, or get a basic income before we go to work.
EIGHT people own HALF the wealth of the entire world (again, feel free to google).
With automation, improved efficiency, those at the top keep getting richer. As more folks get unemployed it's more people for fewer jobs so wages stay low.
Cars cost 10 times what they did 35 years ago, but min wage is not much more than triple. It should be $17-20/hour to have kept pace.
My cousin worked a summer job in a steel mill in the 70s during college and was paid $14/hour THEN. Granted, high wages sorta killed that industry (among other reasons) - but today union jobs don't pay that for full time workers (GM, local gov't transit, teamsters get $15 locally). YOu can't really live on 30k a year - and then pay for health care too.
EIGHT people own HALF the wealth of the entire world (again, feel free to google).

I heard that if you only had the change that people typically have on their dressers, you would be amoung the whatever, so many percent, richest people in the world.
But again, does it really matter? These comparisons?
I think we should focus on what we waste.
In a sense, does that really matter? Sure, maybe some people should have more, but what does that have to do with the people that have lots? What is wealth really? So they have more numbers in their bank accounts or more cars.
Under that system, If the person that has lots is expected to share, then the person with little should also be expected to share with those that have nothing.
An investment consultant once told me that there are only two types of people. Those that earn interest and those that pay it. Really, I am neither.
Think about this the next time you may be tempted to complain about "rich people".
If you make just $32,400 per year in U.S. dollars, you are making more money than 99% of the rest of the people on the planet. You are the 1% that so many people get fixated on.
Wealth is the money you don't spend.
So..your investments, savings, equity in yuor house, etc.
If you're living paycheck to paycheck--or can't make it to the next paycheck, or debt exceeds assets...then you have no wealth.
they say if you make more than 390k a year you're in the top 1%, more than 77k and you're in the top 10%.
Living on 32,400 in a third world country would likely make you the richest guy in town, surely in the village.
here, in the US, you can't buy a house or perhaps even a car with that income. Locally rent can be $1200/month, plus utilities. The average car is what, $34k now? A full size 4x4 is north of 50k.
You got it!It's not so much about what you make as how you spend it. Or don't.
Is there anything more inane than buying trash bags so you can throw them away?