CHDinCT
Veteran Member
Wow, I guess I'm in the minority as I just don't see this as as big an issue as most are making it and I'm one of those new BX owners that bought if for residential use similar to what's in the brochures. Strictly speaking, from a warranty perspective, there is no case to exchange the loader so long as it works as intended. That said, Kubota might want to exchange it as a gesture of goodwill and to protect their good name.
I also disagree with the statements that quality is gone down in general and we consumers are just accepting it. On a value to cost basis, most machinery, electronics and what not have gotten significantly better and more reliable over the years. I have several TVs over 20 years old that still work - never replaced a vacuum tube or picture tube like was common 30 years ago. Cars and trucks now go well past 100K miles routinely. There may be more plastic and other "lower" quality material than years ago, but the engineering of most products is significantly better, and I'd venture to say tractors as well, albeit I'm new to this market. Just think of all the additional features these new tractors come with. We all make a price vs value decision when we buy anything of much significance and if we feel the quality is not there for the price, we buy another brand or another model where we feel comfortable with this equation
I also think that no one is considering what productivity requirements may be put on the welders in this case. Maybe they are required to weld 10 a day where 8 a day would result in nicer, more aesthetically pleasing welds, but no more stronger. To get the quality the OP wants in this case might require lower productivity (8 vs 10 welded loaders per day per worker) which comes back to price vs value. Would we all pay more for the nicer welds? Some would and some wouldn't, and that's what makes a free market work. Nobody is forcing anyone to buy an inferior product.
Now, If I were the OP and it bothered me as much as it does him, I would see the dealer about what could be done, but I wouldn't necessarily think Kubota had an enforceable requirement to do anything.
I also disagree with the statements that quality is gone down in general and we consumers are just accepting it. On a value to cost basis, most machinery, electronics and what not have gotten significantly better and more reliable over the years. I have several TVs over 20 years old that still work - never replaced a vacuum tube or picture tube like was common 30 years ago. Cars and trucks now go well past 100K miles routinely. There may be more plastic and other "lower" quality material than years ago, but the engineering of most products is significantly better, and I'd venture to say tractors as well, albeit I'm new to this market. Just think of all the additional features these new tractors come with. We all make a price vs value decision when we buy anything of much significance and if we feel the quality is not there for the price, we buy another brand or another model where we feel comfortable with this equation
I also think that no one is considering what productivity requirements may be put on the welders in this case. Maybe they are required to weld 10 a day where 8 a day would result in nicer, more aesthetically pleasing welds, but no more stronger. To get the quality the OP wants in this case might require lower productivity (8 vs 10 welded loaders per day per worker) which comes back to price vs value. Would we all pay more for the nicer welds? Some would and some wouldn't, and that's what makes a free market work. Nobody is forcing anyone to buy an inferior product.
Now, If I were the OP and it bothered me as much as it does him, I would see the dealer about what could be done, but I wouldn't necessarily think Kubota had an enforceable requirement to do anything.