Again, I think the welding job is done poorly. Although it is really too late to reject it.
There is a lot of blame being thrown at Kubota, they should have done this and they should have done that. Kubota made the product, offered it for sale, and your free to inspect it, and buy it, or pass on it.
I can assure you, they did the research, and they know how much they can get for a tractor. Then the machine is built, working backwards from that price point. Every step and piece, is part of that price point. This tractor was made, and passed inspection within those limits. Meaning, any changes to the process will likely increase the final price. As manufacturing costs increase, adjustments have to be made. Do we eliminate a step that is cosmetic? or increase the price? He already feels, it was expensive, how much more would he have paid to get the machine, he thought that he bought?
The general consensus here seems to be that because he had expectations, they need to be meet. This is not always possible. What if his expectations were unreasonable? What if the next guy is 15x more particular than him, and does not look at the machine at all before, before buying it, why is Kubota obligated to also meet his expectations later?
Because most everyone here is apparently disappointed in Kubota, they probably will make some concessions to try and satisfy this customer. And that's probably good business. I'm just not sure if it is fair.