JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X

   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #31  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( sfranchok did i understand you when you said you could buy a M105X with a KubotaSL loader for $46.6K?Man i got beat then!!I reasearched the JD and you have to get the 6420 to compare.I can tell you some pro's and con's if you would like.Your like me i was afraid the 0% would expire on Oct.1 2005 but they extended it to Dec.31 )</font>

Mseriesfreak, sorry, I did not look further up in this thread to see what you paid for yours. I think you probably did very well with your price. I think the only reason mine was $3.2K less than yours is because they offered a fleet price rate since I also purchased a mini-excavator. But yes, now that you've had an opportunity to operate your 105 for a few months, I am eager to hear. If you feel that the rear end is light, then I'd reco getting a $200 three point round bale spear so you can carry 2 at a time. After driving the M105X yesterday around the dealer's large lot, I didn't notice what you are referring to.
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X
  • Thread Starter
#32  
congrats sflranchok,I am not the only one tied down for 3 years!The light backend was fine when i had a roll on the back.I also had the bale too high at the time.The loader on the 105 has a heck of a foward reach (which is a good thing)that also takes some weight off of the rear.That bigger pump and the lower air vents on the air conditionong was the only thing i seen better.Kubota's warranty is a year longer on drivetrain,more ground clearance,more gear shifts without changing ranges,bi-speed turning,automatic shifting,electric front locking differental,4wheel brakes. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X
  • Thread Starter
#33  
I forgot to ask.Did you get a radio?I did not, i got one from Circuit City and saved a couple of hundred!!
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #34  
Well,

You are the wiser for going to circuit city. They did agree to go eith the am/fm/cd, somthing which if I'd of thought about it, could probably saved a few more $$'s like you did if I had gotten it on my own. Keep me posted as you discover new things about it,
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #35  
Has anyone seen/used the M125X? I been wanting to check this out but few dealers carry them. Wanted to know what others thought.
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #36  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Has anyone seen/used the M125X? I been wanting to check this out but few dealers carry them. Wanted to know what others thought. )</font>

What part of the country are you located? I am familiar with OK and Ark dealers
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #37  
I did a real close examination of our 105 and for the life of me, I don't see any front brakes...you have a prototype?? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Matter of fact, our M9 and the 105 have similar, very similar front drive units.
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #38  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( I did a real close examination of our 105 and for the life of me, I don't see any front brakes...you have a prototype?? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Matter of fact, our M9 and the 105 have similar, very similar front drive units. )</font>

On the spec sheet for the M105X, it describes the brake type as " Hydraulically operated wet disc brakes, with automatic front axle engagement." Then, in a footnote, it says "The front axle is engaged automatically for braking purposes when both brake pedals are pressed together..." Could this be what he is talking about? I don't know how the M105S or the M9 compare.
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #39  
Mechanically, with the exception of transmission options, the X and the S are similar and the M9 has a similar driveline with different transmission options too. An example is the manual engagement of the front drive unit on the M9. The M9, the 105s and the x all share the same physical front case by visiual inspection....I have looked at them all.

I do believe he was referring to the auto lockup of the front drive upon brake application.....I was just prodding a little. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif

I, for one, don't particularly like the armrest mounted controls on the X. The side mount controls on the S and the M9 are more to my taste and more in keeping with our other tractors.
 
   / JD 6420 $13,000 higher than M105X #40  
I do recall somting about the brakes being incorporated into the transmission, but I could be wrong.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2021 CATERPILLAR 953 CRAWLER LOADER (A51242)
2021 CATERPILLAR...
2005 MACK CHN613 WINCH TRUCK (INOPERABLE) (A50854)
2005 MACK CHN613...
2023 Case IH 4412F 12 Row 30 In. Row Spacing Folding Corn Head (A50657)
2023 Case IH 4412F...
80in HD Tooth Bucket with Side Cutters ONE PER LOT (A51039)
80in HD Tooth...
2014 Doyle Dry Fertilizer Tender Trailer - Kubota Diesel, 3 Stainless Compartments, Side Discharge (A51039)
2014 Doyle Dry...
2008 International 8600 T/A Day Cab Truck Tractor (A48081)
2008 International...
 
Top