OP
8226hamer
Silver Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2003
- Messages
- 179
- Location
- Indiana
- Tractor
- Started with a B-20 Kubota, then B2910, now L2800
canoetrpr said:Like I suspected it looks like I will have a major hassle wrt. getting the new cams done.
I wouldn't get my original dealer to even open up my tractor - they were so incompetent.
I called the new dealer I have made a service appt. at for my 50 hr. and pointed them to the PSB. They sorta weren't too excited to be looking into a warranty issue for me since I hadn't bought my tractor from them (I guess they didn't have a problem booking me in for service since I'm paying!). But I've left it with them for now. Having dealt with the kubota rep in this area, I doubt it will get done.
That said, I've been reflecting on this thread I think that the OP may just have had a lemon. This happens from time to time I imagine in all vehicles, tractors etc. Certainly not a pleasant situation if you are in it and all the worse if the dealer / manufacturer does not stand by you.
Its not clear to me that we can conclude that the over running clutch design is fundamentally flawed. I'm not yet convinced that the failures are wide spread. We have heard of one I think and I imagine a LOT of people are roto-tilling with these tractors. Being an engineer myself I just cannot imagine any reasonable manufacturer not testing a design like this for a reasonable number of hours as part of their normal testing cycle. If there were going to be consistent failures doing something as basic as rototilling after a small number of hours, this would be caught as part of the normal design / test process. It is just too expensive for companies to fix defects in the field / loose customers etc. I could be dead wrong but I'm just thinking rationally. Heck I'm a software guy and we know how much it hurts us the later we find bugs in design. We work very hard to try to find bugs in the earliest phase possible. It's a lot worse for our hardware and I imagine mechanical, industrial engineering peers I imagine.
Realistically, none of us really knows why the cams were changed so that they were not over running any more. I imagine the biggest issue has been the noise .. which is why they initially scrambled to retro-fit with the hydro fluid level kit.
One thing that I don't particularly follow (will re-read the thread to see if I can) is that this being a live PTO, the over running clutch seemed like it had a good purpose - to keep the inertia on the implement from spinning the drive train once the PTO had been disengaged. How is this solved with the new cams?
My advice to the OP would be, I would take the trade in offer on the B3030. It's not the greatest situation in the world to be in but this is a situation that does happen from time to time no matter whose product you buy. The extra $1400 over and above the price difference between the tractors does not sound overly unreasonable to me given you've had a couple hundred hours of service. Far from ideal but I know that thats what I would do.
On the balance of probabilities, given the information we have so far, my rational conclusion would be that there is not an inherent reliability issue with the PTO on these models - even on the early tractors. Maybe new data will prove me wrong.
Until then, I'll hope that I can get the cams changed under warranty - just in case I am wrong, and heck, would be nice to get the newer technology and stop that dammed noise.
That said, if after some persistence, I can't get them to do this under warranty, I'll just go on and not worry about anything until I hit some problem (hopefully before warranty runs out!) - and chalk it up to one of life's risks. I might think about upgrading to a grand L in another 4 to 5 years anyway but might as well push it out till the new 40 series are proven in the field. The risk does not justify the cost of trading up with 50 hours on the clock with the machine still under warranty at this point.
I'll also hope that by the time I am ready for an upgrade, I'll find a dealer like many of you have who will stand by you when situations like this will come up - and they do from time to time with all makes and models.
I hope that Kubota does right by you 8226hamer and that the next machine you get works out better.
The way my luck goes I very well could have just got a lemon, but I can't see Kubota going to the trouble of redesigning three different style of cams that these tractor have incorporated based on noise alone.
As far as trading for the B-3030, it will happen, but I have a years worth of warranty left on my L2800, and now that Kubotas has agreed to install the new style one way cams in my tractor, I feel obligated to try them out and then see if I was unlucky and just happened to get a lemon.