L39 ROCKS!

   / L39 ROCKS! #21  
Rat,

I will be more careful about grease. I've been good, but not great. I'm beginning to think that 10 hours is too long. I don't want the bucket to get all sloppy in a few years.
 
   / L39 ROCKS!
  • Thread Starter
#22  
Hey Jim, I did spray paint the bucket when I welded on the clevis grab hooks.

I'm taking it in next week to get the rear hydraulic remotes hooked up, haven't had time to attend to that up until now.
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #23  
Can't imagine that can be as heavy as granite. Granite is about as heavy and dense as it gets. However, they are some huge boulders and it's unlikey many CUTS could move them. I wonder if an 8 series loader could lift them on a 4630...I doubt it.
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #24  
Nice...Rear hydraulics! That's something I'm going to have to wait a bit for.

I got my front hydraulics hooked up finally......Can't wait to try a post hole digger with it.
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #25  
L39 weak /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif That person(s) must be confused or have no clue about what to expect of a relatively small TLB.
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #26  
I gotta get out from behind this desk and go git me some boulders.... I've got a hankerin' for some seat time reading this post!

Happy Idependence Day. Many thanks to all the Vets!
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #27  
</font><font color="blueclass=small">( L39 weak /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif That person(s) must be confused or have no clue about what to expect of a relatively small TLB. )</font>

Yes MY L39 is weak, I did not say yours was. I certainly did not expect that I would get a tractor that did not lift what it is rated.

I have a little 1983 17 HP B7200. For what it is that little tractor is, it's not weak. In fact the B7200 can lift 1/2 what my L39 can.
An L39 ought to do 4-5 times what my B7200 can lift. I expect the L39 will be fine, once the dealer sets the hydraulics to spec. The L39 went back to the dealer on 7/1/05. I will also have them do the 50 hour service.

Attached is a photo of a +800 Lbs rock my B7200 was pround that it could lift a few inches and carry some distance. Beat the heck out of trying to push and rolling it up hill.
 

Attachments

  • 685911-DSC00620S.JPG
    685911-DSC00620S.JPG
    82.1 KB · Views: 214
   / L39 ROCKS!
  • Thread Starter
#28  
Let us know how that thing "rocks" when you get it back from the dealer, something certainly is amiss as our L-39 is a virtual bulldozer compared to our L-3130 with the LA723 FEL. /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #29  
<font color="blue"> Let us know how that thing "rocks" when you get it back from the dealer, something certainly is amiss as our L-39 is a virtual bulldozer compared to our L-3130 with the LA723 FEL.
</font>

Interesting you keep mentioning this. I had a L48 that has a much larger bucket and even larger capacity then the L39 and find the L3830 and LA 723 very acceptable and much quicker. Perhaps your L3130's LA 723 is in need of a little attention as well. Of course, the L3830 I have is HST vs GST which I can attest to adding considerable manuverability but then the L48 was also HST. If the L39 had a loader that was removeable, it would be a consideration for me if I had a true need for a hoe on a routine basis. Keep showing us the progress you've made around your abode. RaT...
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #30  
Take it easy there Mike.....I didn't know it was you that they were talking about. I know the story of your machine and hope it gets fixed soon.
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #31  
This weekend, before expanding the doggie hotel fenced in area (It's too big and nice to call it a kennel!) I took down several pine trees including a 90 footer with 18" dia. trunk, along with 3 medium large dead or dying oaks at our southern New Hampshire home skidding and moving the logs with my trusty old B7200.
The B7200 will knock down smaller pines up to about 5" diameter and I can lift out the root ball with the bucket.

(The L39 is going to our future home/farm site in Central NH)
On the smaller Southern NH lot, I appreciate the smaller B7200. Even with 600 lbs of steel plate as ballast added to the loader frame & loaded rear tires, I had to be careful not tipping the tractor lifting and grappling the larger logs if I did not pick them up evenly on level ground.
Admittingly, I have turned up the relief valve on the B7200, but not to the point of it becoming unsafe. I don't think that's even possible given the tiny hydraulic cylinders and 4 GPM Pump on the B7200.

Some have commented on how much faster a LA723 loader is than a L39. I think the L39 is plenty fast. The LA723 I operated once was scary fast.
Anyone thinking any Kubota has slow hydraulics have not operated Deere's with 420 or 430 Loaders or brands like Kioti! The speed of the L39 Loader is just right. If the dealer just sets the pressures, I sure I'll be a happy camper.

I had a Kioti LA3054XS TLB on order with deposit, but canceled for the slightly larger L39 when the land buy in central NH happened. The 3 reasons that prompted me to cancel the Kioti purchase were

1. Wicked slow hydraulic. The KL1231 loader is powerful, but very slow. the total hydraulic capacity of the 3054XS is only 10 GPM. Anyone thinking any Kubota has slow hydraulics have not operated the older Deere's or brands like Kioti! The speed of the L39 Loader is just right. If the dealer just sets the pressures so that the machine meets spec., I sure I'll be a happy camper.

2. Cramped operator station. This 3054 was basically an updated 1985 design before the Koreans figured out Americans have big butts, feet and long legs.

3. I did not think 30 HP was going to cut it on 17 Acres that needs "construction" type work. I figure I can give the B7200 a rest, leaving the heavy lifting for the L39, once we move.

The Kioti was %60 the cost of the L39.

Kioti's new DK45S w/KL-451 loader Specs similar to the L39, with more power and optional Air conditioned cab and is worth a look as an Agricultural machine, but the BH is about 70% of the L39 and the L39 Hydraulics blow the DK45S's away, fit and finish are better on the L39.

No word from the dealer yet on the L39 Loader issue.

Mike
 

Attachments

  • 688253-clip_image002.jpg
    688253-clip_image002.jpg
    57.9 KB · Views: 199
   / L39 ROCKS!
  • Thread Starter
#32  
RaT, I really do enjoy the L-3130 with LA723 FEL to the max, it is a very powerful machine and ours now has 725 heavy duty hours on it without a whimper. It is the best all around workhorse I could imagine for our place, all things considered. At times, when I am grading our limerock 3 mile road with a 84" BB, I think I could use a L-3830 like yours for a little more power, weight, and larger tires but the little 3-cylinder L-3130 keeps chugging along under extreme load doing its business.

But it is nothing near as powerful as the L39 with TL1000 FEL, there is no comparison. THe L39 is like a tank compared to it, however both units have their specific purposes.... /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 
   / L39 ROCKS! #34  
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

1989 AM General M998 HMMWV 4x4 Humvee Truck (A59230)
1989 AM General...
200 Gallon Tank (A57148)
200 Gallon Tank...
2021 MULTIQUIP 25 WHISPERWATT DIESEL GENERATOR (A59823)
2021 MULTIQUIP 25...
2015 VANTAGE TRAILER 3 POD PNEUMATIC TRAILER (A55745)
2015 VANTAGE...
JLG 660SJ (A58214)
JLG 660SJ (A58214)
Woods 18ft Batwing Rotary Cutter (A56438)
Woods 18ft Batwing...
 
Top