If price was no object (I think there's about a $5,000 premium for the L5240 over the MX5100) is there any reason why I should buy the MX5100 instead of the Grand L5240. Both would be HST and open station.
I do a lot of tractor work (plowing and/or tilling) in smaller (1/4 to 1 acre) market garden plots. Plus manure management (loader work) and bush hogging about 12 acres a year.
I know many like the "simplicity" of the MX5100 but I actually like the HST Plus features of the Grand L's and think I would find the features useful.
Spec wise I think they are both quite similar in their capabilities. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking some advantage of the MX machine (besides a lower price!)
Opinions, please!
I do a lot of tractor work (plowing and/or tilling) in smaller (1/4 to 1 acre) market garden plots. Plus manure management (loader work) and bush hogging about 12 acres a year.
I know many like the "simplicity" of the MX5100 but I actually like the HST Plus features of the Grand L's and think I would find the features useful.
Spec wise I think they are both quite similar in their capabilities. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking some advantage of the MX machine (besides a lower price!)
Opinions, please!