imho...the metal roof makes no difference at all ...unless it (the metal) is "somehow" grounded to the earth...
what makes the most difference is where the building is located...if it's on the top of a hill and is the highest thing in the area..(i.e., on a hill in the middle of a field)...it makes sense to protect (ground) it from strikes...
otherwise, so called "grounding rods" only attract strikes...if there are tall trees in close proximity lightning is more apt to strike the most "grounded" object...
In older structures where cast iron was the prominent material used for plumbing and vent stacks protruded through the roofs...they essentially became "lightning rods"...logic is the key to determining whether they (lightning rods) are beneficial or not...IMO
When I was a kid our neighbor, who knew it all, had improperly installed not only the lightening rods but the panel ground on his new barn. We had just gotten the hay in. I was looking out the window at home watching this lightening storm when I saw the barn get hit. My Dad and I got there and got the horses out, but it was a pretty depressing sight watching that barn go, and boy did it go fast. Do it once, so it right.:thumbsup:
...otherwise, so called "grounding rods" only attract strikes...if there are tall trees in close proximity lightning is more apt to strike the most "grounded" object...
I want to preface my comments by stating that I have zero education in working with lightning rods, but I did have a shovel I was holding get hit once and it burnt my belt buckle and blew the steel toe off my right shoe. I lived, as you may have guessed.
....
I am not an expert and Have never seen any evidince either way but I have my doubts that they will work.
The only ones you see around here anymore are on OLD barns and structures. Dads place (early 1900's farm house) has them on a few of the structures. They are aluminum with and aluminum cable. I have my doubts how good this would be in a lightning strike. I would think that it would just vaporize the cable in an instant.
Also, If he is putting on a metal roof, what good are the rods sticking up in the air? The whole roof is metal and will be electrified.
Again, this is just my opinion and observations so take it with a grain of salt because I may have no clue at all. But whatever you do, follow the code in the area. Regardless of what you "want" to do, They are always right![]()
I want to preface my comments by stating that I have zero education in working with lightning rods, but I did have a shovel I was holding get hit once and it burnt my belt buckle and blew the steel toe off my right shoe. I lived, as you may have guessed.
Yeah, he had me wondering a bit. This could explain it.Funniest post on TBN, I don't believe you lived.
Sounds like your proof positive for lightning rods.![]()
![]()
[] Cu fer sher, altho not so big as that. Good conductor and hi mass. This gives it a lot of thermal "inertia" and lightening, atho a huge current, is very short duration and would hardly warm a several inch cable. Turns out that the inherent almost instant action of electrostatic events favors conduction by a flat profile conductor to lessen inductance vs a round one. Id go for about a 2" wide ground strap similar to the [smaller] ones often used in vehicles to handle the start current. Id be concerned that it not be touching combustibles tho because it may warm to several hundred degrees in a strike. --- Another reason for Cu: high melt point vs Al. ... ~1900 vs 1100FIn the rural sticks where I live, there are a lot of old farm houses and structures. Some protected and some not. I have seen many aluminum cables for the straps. I have also seen steel cables tied in with a metal roof and connected to a grounding rod. [[Either way, even if copper were used, I think it would have to be a 4 or 5 inch cable to handle it.]] Maybe biggger. And I have never seen anything close.
Bottom line, I personally have never seen any proof that they work. Sure I have seen many small scale expirements. But for all the ones out there that prove they work, there is just as many that prove they dont. So I will continue to be a non believer until someone can show me real hard proof on a full scale. And then be able to prove whether the damage with the rods is less than what would have happened without the rods.
I think someone should submit this to mythbusters:laughing:
...homeowner lost most of his expensive electronics that were not surge protected...