Valveman
Platinum Member
But then you did get into it here. Ditching the Cycle Stop Valve would be removing the most important part of the pump system. ANYWHERE the CSV has been "thrashed extensively" they fail to give any empirical evidence of the problem. They say back pressure is bad for a pump, but they never show an example of a problem caused. They say a CSV will destroy pumps, yet after 33 years there has never shown a single example of a failed pump. They say a CSV waste energy, but they can't make that happen. I have been waiting 33 years for the other shoe to drop, for someone to actually find a fault with the CSV system. It has never happened, and I don't think it ever will. After all this time I think I can safely say the Cycle Stop Valve is the most elegant solution for pump system problems that exist to date. So please, show me a failed pump, a high electric bill, or some kind of evidence before you continue to "thrash" the Cycle Stop Valve unjustifiably. But I have found that controversy stirs interest, as all the "thrashing" gets intelligent people to call and ask questions.Personally, I would ditch the cycle stop, but that has been thrashed extensively elsewhere, and I don't want to get into it here.
If you don't have the space, I'd go with the 26 gallon tank.
All the best,
Peter
A 26 gallon size pressure tank only holds about 6 gallons of water. Even a couple of the largest tanks they make will not stop the cycling like a Cycle Stop Valve does. When there is a lot of usage or leaks of less than 2 GPM we recommend a larger tank with the CSV. But a 20 gallon tank with the CSV will handle leaks and low flow rates and any larger tank is not needed.