Log cabin construction

   / Log cabin construction #61  
Once again I agree with N80 ( a.k.a. George)

I am willing to bet that Paddy's logs were "air dried" logs causing all the probelms he stated earlier.
If log homes leak so much air why is it widely known that log homes as a whole, are more efficient than other syle homes?

The key to a good, solid air tight log home is kiln dried logs. there is no two ways about this. If your log are NOT dry you are going to have shrinkage, shifting and air leaks. If they are kiln dried these problem are non existent.

My home is now 8 yrs. old and I haven't seen even one of the problems Paddy has mentioned yet. My builder also has a log home that was 20+ yrs old back when he built mine and his showed ZERO signs of the problems Paddy described also.

If you ask me Paddy probably skipped the research part of building a log home and made some building choices that resulted in less than perfect results...

I know that there are log homes out there with the problems that Paddy has described, I have seen them. Every single one of those homes are either air dried logs and/or poorly designed by the local "here today gone tomorrow" loghome dealer...

Lack of planning will spawn poor results in just about anything, especially log homes.
 
   / Log cabin construction #62  
dmccarty said:
Back in 2000ish when we where looking at homes to build I noticed the log home kit manufactuers always seemed to have a sale. Where someone "ordered" the kit but then walked away. I could not figure if this was a scam to buy the kit or people really did put down money and then walk.

Dan

This happens with every big purchase item packages, Log home packages, pole buildings, etc... It is almost always a result of people NOT being able to secure the finanancing for these products. it usually has nothing to do with the quality of the product.
People GROSSLY underestimate the price it will cost to finish a Log home. They think that package price is pretty much what the total cost will be to dry in the home. This is very much not the case as any log home owner will tell you.. Again, it comes down to lack of research and planning....
 
   / Log cabin construction #63  
scesnick,

I don't want to keep the fight reved up but I have to debate your claim """widely known that log homes as a whole, are more efficient than other syle homes? "". Do a web search for most efficient homes.

Most of the problems I've seen over the years with log homes were other folks homes that I was hired to repair, like Edy's experince. I have a timber frame with 2x6 framed in between the bents. Timber frames have mostly vertical members so shrinkage is not an issue.

Kiln dried logs are most beificial during construction and the proceeding year. This can eliminate the "drying in period". Let's all recall, we keep hearing about 100+ year old log homes still in good shape and I think we can be reast assured they were not kiln dried.

But speaking in general about the traits of wood, not specific to logs, wood will shrink and expand regardless how it was dried depending on the humidity. (The slower a wood is dried the less internal stress. Oak is known for "Honey coming" if dried to quickly.) But in any case, kiln dried wood exposed to high humidity will absorbe the moisture and expand. I was was called out to a job where a floor buckled badly. It was high quality kiln dried flooring installed in the dead of winter, very dry. Later in the un-airconditioned Summer, the wood expanded and buckled badly. The floor was completely removed and reinstalled, but this time in Summer when the wood was at it's maximum size. All is good now. This is just one example of showing wood expansion. You can Google or Wicipedia it, know facts of wood.

Many log homes are designed to work with the shrinkage. A freind just had a home built and all the interior walls were aloud to "float".

Where I've seen problems are obviously where maintace was not kept up. I do not claim every log home will be a disater. Only that you need to be diligent in keeping it up. Log homes will act very diff in diff regions. I did not intend to direct the potential issues of log structures at any one style or location or lastly any one poster, but just general points.

Patrick T
 
   / Log cabin construction #64  
While this is one of those discussions when it seems there are some strong arguments for and against, it's also a discussion where everyone is right. I can't argue or debate any of the facts that have been stated, and have enjoyed reading everyones views.

I do think that there are a few things that have been overlooked. While allot of log homes are very well built and as strong as any other house, probably more so in allot of comparisons, there still remains the geographical issues that some log homes have here in the South. I've been throughout Montana and been in old cabins that are well over 100 years old that look amazing. I tend to look at a home different then most people and usually pick out issues that most homeowners are not aware of. It's what I do for a living. In those log homes that I've seen up North, the wood looks great compared to what I've seen here in East Texas.

The fact that some log homes are hundreds of years old really doesn't address the problem of builidng a new one or how long a modern day log home will last. How many of those buildings built 100 years ago are still standing? One percent? Obviously we don't know, but because one is in perfect condition doesn't take into consideration all the others that have rotted away. I'm not saying it's because they are log homes, because allot of them had poor roofs that fell apart. Once that happens, it's just a matter of time for the rest of it to start rotting. The same thing has happened to rock, brick and dirt homes. Once the roof is gone, the rest will soon disapear.

The other issue is how much time does it take to maintain a log home. Brick homes don't take allot of upkeep. The soffits seem to be the biggest problem on most of them, but like every home, what mother nature can get to, she will ruin. Another thing that happens is that some people create issues with their homes that lead to problems. Preasure washing a house causes all sorts of problems. I'm not trying to single anybody out, but this is a problem that happens all over. Homes are not designed to withstand water that comes at it under high preasure. They are built to withstand a certain windload and rain water. Preasure washers force water into areas that should never get any water. This Old House had a really good episode about the damage a preasre washer does to a house. They washed both a brick and lap siding house down for just a few minutes, then took it apart. The water went right throught the bricks in places and just saturated the lap siding all the way past the insulation to the paper siding inside the walls!!!!!!

I will never preasure wash an house. I use a pump sprayer or a garden hose with cleaner attached to the nozzle when dealing with mold or dirt issues. The idea is to wash it off and/or kill the mold. Blasting it off might work for a quick fix, but the long term damage is just beginning by doing this.

Even worse is when people do this before painting. It takes weeks or even longer for the water to dry out after preasure washing. If the caulking is damaged from the washing, then recaulking can, and does, lock in the water. Same with paint.

As for log homes, exposed wood has issues here in my area. I don't know how long it takes to happen, but I do work with a few realtors and can tell you that log homes sell for less then brick homes because of the problems associated with them. I can't say that every log home around here has rot, but I can say that allot of them do. This isn't a statement against log homes, it is a warning for those who want to build or buy one in this part of the country. Nothing more or less.

Most of my work when doing repairs is rot related on stick built homes with brick siding. They have water rot issues too, but it's a totally different problem that's almost always due to a shortcut taken when built of a home improvement. Lack of flashing, not keeping gutters clean, dirt build up against the walls and modifications made after the roof was installed. Mostly sky lights, but vents also cause allot of issues.

All homes have issues. I can find a fault with every home ever built, it's just a matter of to what degree it's happening and what the homeowner can live with. It's all about compromise. Most homeowners are more concerned with apperances over function. Curb apeal will sell a home faster then a brand new roof ever will. Log homes sell faster and for more money in some parts of the country, but not here in East Texas. I really don't think it's because we're not as smart when building as other places, but that the history of problems with the homes is well documented and home buyers shy away from buying a home with known issues.

Eddie
 
   / Log cabin construction #65  
Eddie,

That is good info on using pressure washers on houses.

We have a cheap electric pressure washer. :eek: Still don't like the electric part but it does what needs to be done. Which nowadays is washing the house trim. Our well is 100 feet from the house. The faucet we use is as far from the well as it can get. The PEX comes into the house goes into the attic, crosses the house, then goes back down the wall and finally gets to the faucet. Add enough hose to get around the house and there is not what I would call water pressure. :D Its more of a dribble. :eek: I bought one of the nice fireman nozzles for the house. It don't work. Not enough pressure at the end of the hose. :(

The cheapo electric pressure washer does not put out much pressure any distance from the nozzle. And we are cleaning "plastic" trim 4 to 18 feet over our head. I think we got more volume and water pressure at the end of a hose at the city house than we do with are so called pressure washer. Our bricks have colored grit on them. Washing them would not be a good idea. I guess if the brick was growing algae it might need washing. Other wise why wash brick? Course people paint brick which I never understood either....

In the This Old House Episode was the water squirting through the brick from the pressure washer? That would surprise me. Water soaking through the brick would not surprise me. Brick will leak water that is why a brick house should have weep holes. One of Lstiburek's books/web pages shows him water a brick veneer wall with a garden hose. Quite a bit of water was on the "inside" of the brick.

Later,
Dan
 
   / Log cabin construction #66  
dmccarty said:
No, but isomeone looking at building a log home should be aware that these problems exist and need to be addressed. Otherwise how would they know the difference between a good/bad design and good/bad build?

Nothing wrong with pointing out strengths and weaknesses. But you have to distinguish between weaknesses that are unique to a certain design. Virtually any type of construction will suffer if water and moisture are not controlled. This is not a unique flaw in a log home. Nor are termites, powder post beetles, shrinkage, painting/staining, proper over hand and all that.



Mentioning things to watch out for in building a particulare type of home is not an argument against that type of home.

See above.

If he wants one, go for it. But he should know the pros and cons so he can make informed decisions. Is that not why he is asking questions?

Of course, but for an answer to have any meaning it must have context and the proper perspective. To tell him that wet wood will rot is hardly of any value to him. He needs to know how this applies to a log home and how it is relative to other homes. To mention the words "powder post beetle" in conjunction with "need I say more" is meaningless. A powder post beetle will eat a stud wall just as well as a log one.
 
   / Log cabin construction #67  
EddieWalker said:
While allot of log homes are very well built and as strong as any other house, probably more so in allot of comparisons, there still remains the geographical issues that some log homes have here in the South.

Eddie, have the problems you've seen been unique to log homes? That's the real issue. I've had several major repairs in my stick built home due to wood rot from improper roofing and flashing particularly in the eaves but in some walls too. With that being the case, why wouldn't you say the same thing about stick built homes? If its true about stick built homes them it is hardly a flaw, fault or feature of a log home.

I also don't understand why you think the issue is regional. Is it just because of the humidity? I can't help but doubt that. You may have higher humidity in your region than mine, but it can be by much. As mentioned, I have 4 log homes from which to draw my experience, from 2 to 30 years old. Humidity and rot have not been issues. Why not? I think it is because they are well designed, well built and well maintained.

In those log homes that I've seen up North, the wood looks great compared to what I've seen here in East Texas.

Eddie, you are right about how some folks look at a home, vs. how a builder or inspector might. And I don't normally spend a lot of time inspecting my cabin. But since this thread has been on my mind, I did a once over of my cabin, around and under. The surface of the logs look perfect. I'm not kidding. (Some might consider checking a flaw, I do not, its what logs do). And I'm no kidding about this either, but I walked around the cabin with a hose and squirted water on the walls. Even on the noticeably faded east and west walls, the water not only beads, it literally bounces off. If I keep the hose in one place, the water does begin to adhere since the surface is rough. But it dries quickly. I also spent some time poking and prodding looking for rot, mold, mildew, soft wood. I found none. There are a few places that need some caulk.

So my point is, if log homes are not a good idea in the south, why is mine holding up so well? And remember, I hired the cheapest, least experienced moron of a builder I could find.....me. The same B-I-L who helped me build it also helped build the one down the road 20 years ago. It is also in great shape.

The other issue is how much time does it take to maintain a log home.

I keep hearing this. Why does it take more to maintain than any other type? Mine will need staining again after nearly six years. How often do people paint houses with wood siding or trim. The wood trim on my residence was painted about five years ago. It needs it again. A few years after that and the Hardi-plank will need a coat too. I wouldn't say that logs are the easiest to maintain, but I would argue that they aren't significantly more time consuming than many other 'standard' materials.

Brick homes don't take allot of upkeep.

I think that is true. I personally like brick more than just about anything else. I do think it needs more upkeep than some give it. And as you mention, there are soffits, trim, etc etc.

As for log homes, exposed wood has issues here in my area.

I don't think there is anywhere that exposed wood is care free. But that does not (to me) make wood (siding or logs) a bad choice, even here down south. Log homes are popping up all over the place. There is a mansion on the cove my mom and dad live on that looks like a Cabelas store. Its got to be pushing ten years old and looks like new. There is another one just being completed just around the bend that is the nicest looking home on Lake Wylie in my opinion. I have a hard time thinking that these folks have made a poor choice. Time will tell.

I don't know how long it takes to happen, but I do work with a few realtors and can tell you that log homes sell for less then brick homes because of the problems associated with them.

Eddie, I'm pretty sure that is true of any type of construction compared to brick. It was true when I was shopping for a home 11 years ago, and I did not look at any log homes.

I can't say that every log home around here has rot, but I can say that allot of them do.

I don't doubt you for a second. But put that statement in context. If you are truly honest, don't you think you could say that about any type of home? It might not be true where you are, but it is here. Termites, rot, water damage, settling, etc. It happens to all home types around here, even brick. It doesn't matter what's on the outside; if termites eat your sill, you've got problems.

This isn't a statement against log homes, it is a warning for those who want to build or buy one in this part of the country. Nothing more or less.

But for that warning to have context you would have to be able to say that a higher percentage of log homes have rot problems compared to other common types of construction. And for you to make such a statement would require you to know (or at least have a general idea of) how many logs homes did not have such problems.

They have water rot issues too, but it's a totally different problem that's almost always due to a shortcut taken when built of a home improvement.

How is this different from what you see with log homes? The pictures you showed us demonstrate pretty clearly a bad design. In other words, a mistake has caused the problem, not something inherent in the material.

All homes have issues.

Amen to that. And anyone who tries to sell any specific type as perfect is blowing smoke.

I really don't think it's because we're not as smart when building as other places, but that the history of problems with the homes is well documented and home buyers shy away from buying a home with known issues.

Are you absolutely sure that is why? You might be right, but I'll throw out another guess. Log homes are not typical. For one thing, the 'charm' that has been mentioned does not appeal to everyone. Most folks looking for a brick home would think of a log home as quaint and folksy and probably unsophisticated....which is the root of the log home. Most buyers looking for a McMansion or even a Mini McMansion do not visualize or look for a log home. Second, because a log home is not typical the average buyer is going to be afraid of it because it is different and it is an unknown.

So you might be right about the market in your area but I'm certain that these things figure in the resale value on any market. Which makes me wonder if you are over-estimating the problems and issues factor when it comes to resale.

Regardless, I'd guess that the one true and unique flaw in a log residence would be resale value for the reasons I mentioned above. There are just goig to be far, far fewer people who are looking to buy someone else's log home. But after all, the original context of this thread was DIY cabins in the woods.
 
   / Log cabin construction #68  
A couple of Log cabin pics. We've been in the home for close to 3 years.

Here's a pic of the youngest member of our family hiding when we first got her. At the top of the stairs she just walks out on the log and sleeps there.

ksligh


Here's one of the garage that really shows the corners good. I put special log end treatment on all of the ends since that is where the water gets sucked in the most.

Image of hog2 - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here's a shot of the woodstove

100_1372.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here's another shot of the corners, and a 1954 SML sax I was trying to sell on Ebay.

100_1343.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here's another shot of the inside (some friends that were visiting)

Image of Our new friends - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here's one of our dogs training my daughter to feed her ;)

Image of Katie homeschooling Ferris - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Here's our back porch. Note the 3 story cat house...and of course, a cat on top.

Image of Que Porch 1 - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

A big snow for us

Image of The cabin 1 - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Eddie, of course the only one's you see have problems...they call you to fix them right :D But those fellas looked pretty neglected to me...good stain at the correct time will cover a multitude of sins:)

But yes, I'd definately find a way to get rid of places that water is getting into or sitting on. My home if not a Southland home, but I've used their calk exclusively and think it is great. The folks that sold us our logs and put them up said there was no need for calk, but I calked every run, inside and outside because it looks better, and I didn't want water to get in between them and sit.
 
   / Log cabin construction #69  
Kurt, that's an awesome looking home. Those logs are huge and they look great. One thing I always thought about with a log home with big logs like that: If the termites, beetles and rot get hold of them it will take them a lot longer than anything else to give way. That's a lot of wood!

I also agree with you about end treatment, joints and stain. Those are key areas. And the good stains are pretty remarkable stuff. They penetrate well and keep a slightly oily feel for at least a year. But I'm just amazed that mine repels water like a waxed car after 5 years of full sun and weather. And if this is any measure (it may not be) but my logs, and even the 'log trim' siding covering the sill are in far better shape than the treated lumber the porch floor is made of.
 
   / Log cabin construction #70  
Hi George,

I'll try to answer you as best that I can.

N80 said:
Eddie, have the problems you've seen been unique to log homes? That's the real issue. I've had several major repairs in my stick built home due to wood rot from improper roofing and flashing particularly in the eaves but in some walls too. With that being the case, why wouldn't you say the same thing about stick built homes? If its true about stick built homes them it is hardly a flaw, fault or feature of a log home.

Yes, the problems that log homes have are very unique to that style of home. I've seen it to a much worse degree in sheds with t1-11 siding too, but that's another topic altogether.

It's the overhanging logs that stick out in the corners, and the bottom several rows of logs where water either splashes off the roof without gutters, or with gutters that are nut working. No other home style has these issues that I'm aware of, or I should say, that I've dealt with. Water splashing off the ground is what I attribute the problem with the bottom rows of the logs that I've seen. It could also be that rain water running down them causes the problems, but I don't know why it would only be the bottom logs if that was the cause?

[/QUOTE] I also don't understand why you think the issue is regional. Is it just because of the humidity? I can't help but doubt that. You may have higher humidity in your region than mine, but it can be by much. As mentioned, I have 4 log homes from which to draw my experience, from 2 to 30 years old. Humidity and rot have not been issues. Why not? I think it is because they are well designed, well built and well maintained.[/QUOTE]

I've never worked on the East Coast and the only time I've spent there was a few months at Quantico VA when in the Marine Corps. I feel that the humidity is an issue here with the log homes and all exposed wood. Fences, trim and sheds all suffer from rot here. I'm told it's because of the humidity and rains that we get. I don't have any proof of this, it's just what others tell me and what I've seen of wood that's rotted out that I wouldn't expect to see in California. I'm from there and there is just about no humidity. Wood rot there is almost unheard of in comparing similar homes or structures.

I agree that being well designed, well built and well maintained is the key to everything. Unfortunately, it usually takes a decade or more to find out if it really is well built and designed. Some time, it's something silly that nobody thought of or noticed, but lack of maintenance is always part of the problem in just about every case. With enough sealer and water proofing, it wouldn't matter how much water hit a log home, it would never be able to rot. I agree with you on this 100%!!!



[/QUOTE]Eddie, you are right about how some folks look at a home, vs. how a builder or inspector might. And I don't normally spend a lot of time inspecting my cabin. But since this thread has been on my mind, I did a once over of my cabin, around and under. The surface of the logs look perfect. I'm not kidding. (Some might consider checking a flaw, I do not, its what logs do). And I'm no kidding about this either, but I walked around the cabin with a hose and squirted water on the walls. Even on the noticeably faded east and west walls, the water not only beads, it literally bounces off. If I keep the hose in one place, the water does begin to adhere since the surface is rough. But it dries quickly. I also spent some time poking and prodding looking for rot, mold, mildew, soft wood. I found none. There are a few places that need some caulk.

So my point is, if log homes are not a good idea in the south, why is mine holding up so well? And remember, I hired the cheapest, least experienced moron of a builder I could find.....me. The same B-I-L who helped me build it also helped build the one down the road 20 years ago. It is also in great shape. [/QUOTE]

If I gave you the impression that I'm somehow being critical of your log home or log homes in general, I'm not. I said early on that I would love to have one of my own and if we move to the Rocky Mountains, I will live in a log home. I really like them allot. Just not here.

As to why your home is doing so well, I can only speculate that you are probably a better person at taking care of it then those who do have issues.

The ones that I've seen, both to repair, to give an estimate to repair, or to look at with my realtor and a buyer, and all of the ones that I can remember have been owned by elderly people. Does this mean they let their homes go while younger home owners do a better job of staying on top of them? Maybe. I can't remember off the top of my head a messy home or an unkept lawn at any of those homes. In fact, from a distance, they all looked great.

I don't know if I could find any issues with yours or not. Most homes are in great condition, or just need a little maintenance to keep them from having issues down the road. My guess is that I would look places and test areas of wood with a skinny screwdriver that you might not have. Of course, I have no reason to doubt you that you checked your place really good. I'm just generalizing here. Same thing as talking to a mechanic about cars. He's going to notice things that I never would have thought of because he's fixed those things before.

I've just been hired to fix a very large church. The previous guy has been doing it for years and years, but it just keeps getting worse. They have leaks and he's saying they need a new roof. I took over 100 pictures of the building to show how poorly his workmanship was, the problems that he's created by not fixing them right, and how he either ignored, or covered up issues that he should have fixed, but have not become bigger problems. He has allot more experience then I do, but he's either lazy, or just doesn't care anymore. Either way, of the contractors that they had to look over the place, I found and documented far more then all of them combined. Once I get to looking, it just gets worse and worse.

[/QUOTE]I keep hearing this. Why does it take more to maintain than any other type? Mine will need staining again after nearly six years. How often do people paint houses with wood siding or trim. The wood trim on my residence was painted about five years ago. It needs it again. A few years after that and the Hardi-plank will need a coat too. I wouldn't say that logs are the easiest to maintain, but I would argue that they aren't significantly more time consuming than many other 'standard' materials.[/QUOTE]

First, I would consider a house with wood siding to be simlar as a log home for maintenance and rot issues. Wether it's lap siding, board and batton, T1-11 or fake log siding, it all takes yearly inspections maintenance. Staining the log home isn't even on my list of things that you have to do. Sealing it, calking it and ensuring the wood is water proof. Paint or whatever is used, it all has to be maintained on a regular basis.

From what I know, a well painted house with wood trim should last between ten to twenty years. It used to be 20 years easy, but paint wasn't very good for awhile there. I think it's getting better again with the premium brands and primers, but I don't have the experience to prove this.

Without reading back over the entire thread, are you the one who's using a preasure washer on your home? That can cause allot of issues. When I clean a house for a client who's either selling it, or just wants a clean house, I first spray on Zinsser house cleaner with a pump sprayer. I'm a big fan on Zinsser products, especially their primer. Then I just wash it off with a garden hose. In every case, the homes look like they just got painted. Obviously this only applies to dirty homes. Then a little caulking and touch up paint.

You really suprise me on your comments on having to paint Hardi again. From what I've seen, been told and experienced, Hardi holds paint for a very long time and holds it very well. You have me on this one since it goes against everything that I've seen with it. Hardi is a wonderful product that should hold just about any paint for decades. It does't rot, it's bug proof and it's just about impossible to burn. I'm at a loss.

[/QUOTE]I don't think there is anywhere that exposed wood is care free. But that does not (to me) make wood (siding or logs) a bad choice, even here down south. Log homes are popping up all over the place. There is a mansion on the cove my mom and dad live on that looks like a Cabelas store. Its got to be pushing ten years old and looks like new. There is another one just being completed just around the bend that is the nicest looking home on Lake Wylie in my opinion. I have a hard time thinking that these folks have made a poor choice. Time will tell.[/QUOTE]

Again, I'm not saying log homes are bad or that I don't like them. My comments are based on what I've seen and sharing those observations with anybody who's planning on building or buying a log home. I love the look of wood, but really try to avoid it for anything that's on the outside of a building. In every case that it's used, I either regret it, or try to talk the client out of it. Money talks, so I use it all the time, but I know it's just a matter of time until I'll be back to deal with it.

There is a flaw in assuming that something is good just because everybody is doing it. I know we're in agreement in our views of global warming and how silly that whole thing is. I also think we can agree that just because somebody has a bunch of money, does not mean they will build the best home. Of the million dollar homes that I've been in, it's shocking some of the sloppy workmanship that I've seen in them. Especially in the framing and wavey walls. It's just me, but I think that allot of those high dollar builders use the cheapest crews that they can find and hide allot of flaws in their homes with fancy trim, cabinets, flooring and lighting. The list goes on on fancy things they add to get the price up and hide the basic issues with the buildings.

If you ever get a chance to meet some cabinet, trim, counter or mirror installers, you'll hear some of the funniest horror stories about how badly those high dollar homes are built.

[/QUOTE]I don't doubt you for a second. But put that statement in context. If you are truly honest, don't you think you could say that about any type of home? It might not be true where you are, but it is here. Termites, rot, water damage, settling, etc. It happens to all home types around here, even brick. It doesn't matter what's on the outside; if termites eat your sill, you've got problems. [/QUOTE]

In a conventional, modern built home, there are layers of barriers. Each layer is designed to keep the elements out of a home, and it all has to fail for the water to get in and do it's damage. In a log home, you have one barrier, and that's the sealer that's on the logs. Maybe a treatment that's put into the logs in some cases, but that's sort of rare from what I know. In order for water to get to a framing stud, it has to get through the brick, then through the house wrap and then the OSB sheething. The most likey failure point on a stick built home is the sill plate. To protect that piece of lumber, it's preasure treated and installed over a foam barrier. Where termites are a problem, a termite shield is also used. I've never seen preasure treated wood used on a log home sil plate, but I don't build them either. Of the ones I've replaced the bottom logs, they were installed directly onto the cement with either tar paper or plastic between the logs and cement. I've never seen termites in a log home, but that doesn't mean they were not there. It could be that their tunnels are easier to spot on a log home, or it could be the chemicals on the logs stop them. I don't know, but you are right that they can be a terrible problem on a stick built home. I have a bathroom job in two months that was destroyed by termites. Cabinets and walls!!!! I'm realy worried about what I'll find when the sheetrock comes off, but that's just part of the job.


[/QUOTE]But for that warning to have context you would have to be able to say that a higher percentage of log homes have rot problems compared to other common types of construction. And for you to make such a statement would require you to know (or at least have a general idea of) how many logs homes did not have such problems.[/QUOTE]

I'm not sure what qualifications I would have to have to make this statment, but it is what I do for a living, and it's what interests me. I am a licensed general contractor and have been doing this full time since 2002, and part time since in was ten when I tiled my first bathroom on my own. Cut the tiles and installed them, which were still in place when that property was sold in 2001. I've worked on Victorians in the SF Bay Area (East Bay and Valley) to old plantation homes here in Texas. I've worked on and built modern homes in both states, and feel confident that I can repair just about any issue that can happen to a house short of foundations and HVAC in this part of the country.

Log homes have more issues then conventional homes. The exposed wood will rot before a stick built home, and they require more maintenance than a stick built home.

If you are a log home owner or planning on buying one, you should either accept that responsiblity and ensure that the home remains in good condition, or realize that the logs will rot. Having a full wrap around porch on all sides that keeps out all water from getting to the logs is probably the only solution to protecting the logs that is fool proof that I know of.

I think you don't have any issues to your log home because you take good care of it. I don't understand the need to paint your Hardi trim in your other home, but my guess is that you also take care of it and are causing the paint to fail. It's just my guess and I don't mean anything by it. I also think that you are not the typical home owner. Heck, you probably wash your tractor after you use it clean off your impliments. Some people take that extra step to take care of their stuff. I think you are that type of person. Unfortunately, most people out there don't do these things.

Eddie
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Hydraulic Breaker Excavator Attachment (A49461)
Hydraulic Breaker...
2010 Keystone Cougar 5th Wheel T/A Travel Trailer (A48082)
2010 Keystone...
2015 Terex PowerScreen TrakPactor 320 Crusher (A50322)
2015 Terex...
Blue-Jet Liquid Fertilizer Applicator (A51039)
Blue-Jet Liquid...
2012 Ford F-150 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A49461)
2012 Ford F-150...
80in HD Tooth Bucket with Side Cutters ONE PER LOT (A51039)
80in HD Tooth...
 
Top