OP
bobintexas
New member
Thanks all for the comments, ideas, and of course the support for my poor FEL skills. What a wealth of experiece. And, yes, I will get a toothbar. Learned that trick from TBN posts.
First let me add some info on my mowing chore. The 1.5 acres I want to finish mow is still field, prairie grass. It is not a sodded or seeded yard. I may have over stated my concerns about marks and mislead that I have nice grass. The house sits back among trees with just a small amount of nice grass for a yard. A push mower works well. I want to cut some of the close in field and frontage a bit nicer than the rotary cutter can do. The tractor can get to these areas just fine. I just don't want to get this area all rutted up over time. From your comments, I am leaning back to R4's for the traction they offer for all jobs and I feel I can drive with better technique.
I have been mulling over and over the suggestions to keep the 7100 for the finish mowing task and small jobs. Very interesting. My older 7100, though, has no mid pto for MMM, has a manual tranny and the pto is transmission driven (ie not continuous). Those features make it some work to mow. I think the right size new tractor (7800) will be so much easier (read fun) that I am afraid the 7100 would just sit there. Regarding other suggestions, if (when) the hand mowing becomes a chore, I can see a riding mower becoming the in-between tool.
Thanks for the positive comments on power/weight. They bring out a few new questions regarding balance. With an easy on/off FEL, I will probably run the mowing operation without the FEL. Tight areas will be that much easier and I won't damage trees. Will I need front weights? How much? For FEL work, can you get by with just one of these - filled rear tires, weight box, or box blade only? Or do you need the combination filled tires plus something? I researched a few TBN posts but I am still not that clear on this issue. My 7100 has filled tires, and I forgot to check the 2710 rental.
The Foldable ROPS comments are very interesting. I have not dealt with ROPS yet, except the rented 2710 kept me much further out from under the trees than I was accustomed to with the 7100 no ROPS. I still think I want foldable ROPS. Didn't realize they were hard to deal with. The extra height won't be a problem, I have 10ft doors. I will need to go to the dealer and operate one.
I appreciate how loyal the 7800 owners are as I am likely to be one. Regarding the 2910 extras, I don't know if they are worth it. It will be interesting to see if the 3030 really is priced lower than a 2910 and how close to the 7800 it gets. The features I value the most are the 3ph attachment and position control. I like the idea of the rear hydraulics but honestly don't know what implement I would want that needs it. I noticed the position control immediately on the 2710 rental compared to my 7100 crude up/down control. I have not tried the QIV but I expect it to be closer to how my 7100 operates than position control. I have to go test it out at the dealer too. Don't know if that can be an individual option to the 7800.
The biggie for me is easy implement hook up. I leave my cutter on (my only implement right now) nearly 100%, whether it makes the FEL job awkward or not, because I think it is so difficult to attach and remove. That will be a problem as the years go by for the length of time I intend to own and operate the new tractor. Plus, I intend to own more implements and swap between them with some frequency in the future. The 2710 rental had telescopic stabilizers which helped some, but I still had to push the cutter around to get it hooked up. I would think the extendable arms, telescopic stabilizers, and ratchet lift rod would be much better. Any experiences? I guess I can add those to the 7800 rather than go all the way to a 2910 (or 3030).
Going down a different path, I have recently been researching TBN for an alternative to those 3ph features - the quick hitch, quick coupler type systems. An example is the Speeco rig. These look and sound pretty slick. One issue seems to be that they all aren't perfectly univerasal, all usually needing some 'adjustment' to your implements, which concerns me some. I am interested in your experiences between the adjustable link system (good enough?) and these quick hitch systems (better?).
Hope you are having a great Thanksgiving holiday.
Bob
First let me add some info on my mowing chore. The 1.5 acres I want to finish mow is still field, prairie grass. It is not a sodded or seeded yard. I may have over stated my concerns about marks and mislead that I have nice grass. The house sits back among trees with just a small amount of nice grass for a yard. A push mower works well. I want to cut some of the close in field and frontage a bit nicer than the rotary cutter can do. The tractor can get to these areas just fine. I just don't want to get this area all rutted up over time. From your comments, I am leaning back to R4's for the traction they offer for all jobs and I feel I can drive with better technique.
I have been mulling over and over the suggestions to keep the 7100 for the finish mowing task and small jobs. Very interesting. My older 7100, though, has no mid pto for MMM, has a manual tranny and the pto is transmission driven (ie not continuous). Those features make it some work to mow. I think the right size new tractor (7800) will be so much easier (read fun) that I am afraid the 7100 would just sit there. Regarding other suggestions, if (when) the hand mowing becomes a chore, I can see a riding mower becoming the in-between tool.
Thanks for the positive comments on power/weight. They bring out a few new questions regarding balance. With an easy on/off FEL, I will probably run the mowing operation without the FEL. Tight areas will be that much easier and I won't damage trees. Will I need front weights? How much? For FEL work, can you get by with just one of these - filled rear tires, weight box, or box blade only? Or do you need the combination filled tires plus something? I researched a few TBN posts but I am still not that clear on this issue. My 7100 has filled tires, and I forgot to check the 2710 rental.
The Foldable ROPS comments are very interesting. I have not dealt with ROPS yet, except the rented 2710 kept me much further out from under the trees than I was accustomed to with the 7100 no ROPS. I still think I want foldable ROPS. Didn't realize they were hard to deal with. The extra height won't be a problem, I have 10ft doors. I will need to go to the dealer and operate one.
I appreciate how loyal the 7800 owners are as I am likely to be one. Regarding the 2910 extras, I don't know if they are worth it. It will be interesting to see if the 3030 really is priced lower than a 2910 and how close to the 7800 it gets. The features I value the most are the 3ph attachment and position control. I like the idea of the rear hydraulics but honestly don't know what implement I would want that needs it. I noticed the position control immediately on the 2710 rental compared to my 7100 crude up/down control. I have not tried the QIV but I expect it to be closer to how my 7100 operates than position control. I have to go test it out at the dealer too. Don't know if that can be an individual option to the 7800.
The biggie for me is easy implement hook up. I leave my cutter on (my only implement right now) nearly 100%, whether it makes the FEL job awkward or not, because I think it is so difficult to attach and remove. That will be a problem as the years go by for the length of time I intend to own and operate the new tractor. Plus, I intend to own more implements and swap between them with some frequency in the future. The 2710 rental had telescopic stabilizers which helped some, but I still had to push the cutter around to get it hooked up. I would think the extendable arms, telescopic stabilizers, and ratchet lift rod would be much better. Any experiences? I guess I can add those to the 7800 rather than go all the way to a 2910 (or 3030).
Going down a different path, I have recently been researching TBN for an alternative to those 3ph features - the quick hitch, quick coupler type systems. An example is the Speeco rig. These look and sound pretty slick. One issue seems to be that they all aren't perfectly univerasal, all usually needing some 'adjustment' to your implements, which concerns me some. I am interested in your experiences between the adjustable link system (good enough?) and these quick hitch systems (better?).
Hope you are having a great Thanksgiving holiday.
Bob