s219
Super Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2011
- Messages
- 8,608
- Location
- Virginia USA
- Tractor
- Kubota L3200, Deere X380, Kubota RTV-X
This is what I'm starting to think as I look at the SCUT marketplace: the needs of the new SCUT customers are different than the needs of the rural/agricultural community, but the tractor makers have traditionally thought in terms of power and "strength" and weight.
When it comes to SCUTs, it's not just a matter of scaling down a big tractor.
I recently tested out a 1025r and came away a little disappointed. The overall quality was there and the machine felt solid, so I'm not knocking JD quality. But I had the sense that it was the little brother of a bigger tractor - not a machine designed from the ground up for smaller, nimble tasks. I am going to go back and check out the BX line again, because I am wondering if they didn't start from a different place years ago when they identified the SCUT clientele before anyone else. (As a side note, the marketing and sales pitches from Mahindra really turn me off because their main objective seems to be to brag about how big and strong their machines are and how puny and wimpy everyone else is, like pro wrestlers talking trash before a match.)
These tractor companies have tough decisions to make. Do they design their SCUTs so people feel like they're sitting on something with "power," or do they go for something more finely tuned to the needs of these customers, who aren't going to be doing ag work with their machines. Is a loader lift strength of 800lbs vs 1000lbs really going to be a game-changer for them? Do lower engine RPMs matter for any reason other than meeting our desire for big engines with low-end torque? Do they fail to deliver either by trying to be all things?
I am going to test out the MF GC1710 before I make my final decision, but I'm leaning towards BX. I hear a lot more raving and excitement from those owners than any other community, which says something to me.
That is an interesting observation, and I think you are on to something. I never really shopped for SCUTs, but have seen and looked at a few on dealer lots and on neighbor's properties.
The BX has always looked like a garden tractor sitting on a beefy frame to me. The body style/size and wheel size are very much inline with a garden tractor. Deere's biggest garden tractors (X700 series) have similar dimensions to the BX, in some cases actually being larger than a BX.
The Deere 1-series and their predecessor (2305 I think) are more like scaled down CUTs to me, though they do have small SCUT size tires and Deere did a lot of nice design work on the 1-series to make them more appealing to the SCUT market than their predecessor.
Same goes for the Mahindra offerings. Interestingly, the largest Mahindra SCUT, the Max 28, is really more along the lines of a Kubota B than a BX from what I have seen (my next door neighbor owns a Max 28). It has some parts that are clearly proportioned larger (loader arms and lift ratings) and others that are small (tires, loader bucket) and almost looks like a parts-bin project in some senses. The Max 28 is very capable for its size, but perhaps over-capable for its size in some ways. For instance, the loader ratings almost border on unrealistic to me, when you consider how much ballast would be needed to achieve them, and how challenging that would be on such a small tractor.