</font><font color="blue" class="small">( </font><font color="blueclass=small">( </font><font color="blueclass=small">( I am beginning to believe that it is better to have a stable full of BX tractors than it is to have all the implements that fit one tractor. I hate taking the loader on and off, especially if I have to put the loader valve back on to use the snow blower or sweeper. I am seriously thinking of buying a used
BX1800 to keep the front mounted quick hitch on permanently.)</font>
Boy, I hear that. On one hand, I like having only 1 internal combustion engine to maintain, as opposed to having a gas engine on each one: tiller,
chipper, generator, etc. On the other hand, changing implements is a pain.
)</font>
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
1*I like having only 1 internal combustion engine to maintain, as opposed to having a gas engine on each one: tiller,
chipper, generator, etc.
2*On the other hand, changing implements is a pain. That's why I have most of my implements on dollies and on smooth concrete.
==============
<font color="purple"> 1*however if that one engine happens to fail it means no tiller,
chipper, generator, etc.
2*I can do these six things with out having to change an implement.
1-endloader
2-back hoe
3-mow with 2 different mowers at the same time.
4-till
5-use a front blade
6-pull up to 3 trailers and or use up to 3 drag chains.
</font> )</font>
*******************
<font color="red">
P S </font>
<font color="green">For me the convenience of avoiding the never ending implement switching is well worth forgoing the one engine concept. </font>