kubotabilly
Gold Member
WhiteRock,
Yes, that was my original plan. I must have looked at that photo a million times and just could not get the design to work. Here's my theory, there are alot of factors that come into play here. 1) The depth & height of your bucket. 2) the design of your arms in relationship to your bucket size. 3) The degree of rollback that Kubota's larger loaders have is either 40 or 45 degrees, that's alot of rollback. I feel the downfall of my "L" shaped arms was the fact that they extended too far out in front of my bucket therefore I had to mount the cylinder farther back to accommodate my opening that I wanted to achieve. It didn't work out or else I gave up to quickly /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif.
Bill <font color="black"> </font>
Yes, that was my original plan. I must have looked at that photo a million times and just could not get the design to work. Here's my theory, there are alot of factors that come into play here. 1) The depth & height of your bucket. 2) the design of your arms in relationship to your bucket size. 3) The degree of rollback that Kubota's larger loaders have is either 40 or 45 degrees, that's alot of rollback. I feel the downfall of my "L" shaped arms was the fact that they extended too far out in front of my bucket therefore I had to mount the cylinder farther back to accommodate my opening that I wanted to achieve. It didn't work out or else I gave up to quickly /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif.
Bill <font color="black"> </font>