There are many posts in this thread suggesting that getting an estimate in advance would have prevented this issue. I'd like to know how that is??? I hate to think of how many times I have obtained an "estimate" for some work and then had the final price be significantly higher. There's always a whole litany of excuses (once in a while valid ones) for why the original estimate was exceeded. I seem to recall enough similar threads on this forum to know that I'm not the only person that this has ever happened to!
Particularly since it appears that many posters beleive that this dealer is not the most scrupulous, of what value would a pre-estimate from him of been?
- Jay
An estimate is not the best way to get a price, and does still leave the door open for further charges. An estimate is necessary, in some cases, because of unknown factors like hidden damage.
The best way to do this job, is with an agreed price. An agreed price is not an estimate. It can be variable, if agreed upon in advance. But, it is a binding contract to do the work as agreed.
For example, you
normally initially get an agreed price, not an estimate, when you build a house.
If a guy says he will paint your house, as agreed by the two of you, for $2000. That's not an estimate, that's an agreed price. Its a binding contract. He can't charge you more, unless you agree to it.
Even in cases where an estimate is required, a competent business man will still be able to give you a rough idea of the cost.
If he received and estimate, of $100 for example, and got presented with a bill for $250, without receiving any notice, or option to back out, the judge is going to find in his favor.
There are crooks out there. Another reason you need to protect yourself.
You can't decide they will get you no matter what, so why try.
Probably the majority of these discrepancies are misunderstandings that could have been avoided with a clear conversation.