Milton Burro
Silver Member
Still seems to me that lots of you are pretty darn trigger happy and that you shoot first and ask questions later. Dogs get out, dogs roam, dig up gardens and can be pests but dogs are also valued pets. To shoot one just because you have the right to, when your life and limb are not in danger, seems cruel, unneighborly and down right stupid.
If anyone ever took an unwarranted shot (life or limb issue excepted) at a family pet of mine that "neighbor" would lose virtually all good will. If I saw smoke coming from his house I'd go get the marshmellows, chocolate and graham crackers rather than lift a finger to help.
My dog problem lasted 18 months before I pulled the trigger, literally. I had talked to the owner twice, and after that, called the sheriff on two different occasions to talk with him. The first thing the sheriff told me over the phone was to "just shoot it.". That's what the responding officer said as well,, both times. I was not trigger happy. However, I am now, as the dog abuser has acquired a new pit bull pup, and I saw it in the back two days ago. When I catch it harassing my animals, I've done all the talking I am going to do. I carry a 9mm on the tractor, but I'm going to install a rifle mount because I do not want to take a chance on the poor dog suffering. 30-06 will kill quick, and I am more apt to make a good shot with a rifle than a pistol. Just because I am in no personal danger, I feel a responsibility to protect the animals I own. So if the stupid bastard refuses to take care of his animals, doesn't mean I have to follow suit.