Degolyerent
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2010
- Messages
- 439
Try some facts instead of tossing insults .
The fact is there is no tuner and the redline is 4000. There is no need to go that high as it will be way ahead of anything you own anyway.
Try some facts instead of tossing insults .
Same reduction ratio for the 1HP motor with 1000lb ft of torque . As the 3.6L Chev 305HP?
The fact is there is no tuner and the redline is 4000. There is no need to go that high as it will be way ahead of anything you own anyway.
You just lost the argument completely with this idiotic statement.
I didn't want say anything but VM is Detroit Diesel, that's the GM connection. MB bought them and use VM too. The 3.0 V6 in the ML and trucks are really VM. Thanks for article, I like it more now, knowing it's a VM design. They are top notch. HSCame across a new article regarding the GM 2.8L Dmax in the Colorado. I was coming to the conclusion that this new offering had its roots in the VM Motori 2.8L. That seems to be correct. The chief designer of the GM 2.8L Dmax started on the project when he was at VM Motori and GM owned a significant share. When GM dumped its stake in VM, this guy moved over to GM and is still the chief designer behind the 2.8 Dmax. Interview: Nicola Menarini, Global Program Manager and Chief Engineer, GM Duramax 2.8L
The 2.8L still has a timing belt right?I didn't want say anything but VM is Detroit Diesel, that's the GM connection. MB bought them and use VM too. The 3.0 V6 in the ML and trucks are really VM. Thanks for article, I like it more now, knowing it's a VM design. They are top notch. HS