New loader valve not working properly

   / New loader valve not working properly #21  
JD4310man:

I think the engine loading is caused by the flow divider. I assume priority flow is to the FEL valve. Assume your pump is producing 16 gpm and you have the flow divider set to provide an 8gpm priority flow to the loader valve. The flow divider sends the first 8gpm to the loader and the excess of 8gpm in this case to the other valve (you never said what that valve was, but I assume three point hitch; it doesn't really matter).

When the pump flow enters the flow divider it can take one of two paths: out the priority flow port or out the excess port. The flow divider works by forcing 8gpm to flow out of the priority flow port regardless of the pressure in that port; it does that by partially blocking the flow out of the excess port. If the FEL valve is in neutral there is very little pressure in the priority flow port because the only resistance to flow comes from losses inside the FEL valve, fittings, hoses, etc.; the spring loaded spool in the priority flow valve restricts the excess flow path only enough to cause 8gpm to flow through the priority port. But suppose you lift the FEL with a heavy load in the bucker that requires 500psig of pressure in the lift cylinders to move the load as fast as you want; that is the 8gpm of priority flow you want from the priority flow valve must over come 500psig of resistance in order to flow into the lift cylinder. The priority flow valve makes the 8gpm keep flowing out of the priority port, despite the fact that it now has to have at least 500psig of pressure, by restricting the flow in the excess port until it is also under 500psig of pressure. The spool in the priority flow valve shifts to partially block the excess flow port until the pressure in the excess flow port and priority flow port are the same; and the spring in the priority flow valve (that you adjusted) determines how much of the flow goes to the priority flow port when those pressures are equal.

Put simply, when you shift the loader valve to send fluid to the loader cylinders you increase the pressure in not only the loader circuit (the priority flow circuit), you also increase pressure to the same level in the excess flow circuit. In the above example, it is not only the 8gpm going to the FEL valve that requires 500psig pressure from the pump, it is also the 8gpm that is passing through the excess flow circuit. So, in your prior two pump set up you were only loading the FEL pump with 500psig when you worked the loader; now in effect you are loading "both" pumps.

Anything increasing the pressure in the priority flow circuit will aggravate the problem; fittings that are too small or with flow restrictors will increase the resistance in the FEL circuit and in turn increase the pressure in both the priority flow port and excess flow port.

The effect was most noticeable in regenerative mode on the bucket for two reasons. First, the nature of the regenerative circuit itself. The faster movement of the cylinder in regenerative comes from redirecting the exhaust flow from the cylinder from the tank to the other cylinder port. For example, if the cylinder to rod area ratio is such that the cylinder moves twice as fast, the cost is that it takes twice as much pump pressure to overcome resistance in the cylinder. Of course, when the bucket is being dumped and the load pulls it down rapidly, there is little if any resistance in the cylinder and and therefore little extra pressure on the pump. Second, your sticky cylinder increased the resistance even when dumping the cylinder to the point that the pump had to produce pressure to make it move. And it had to produce twice the normal pressure because of the regenerative feature. Of course, the effect of that increased pressured was reflected all the way back to the priority valve, which restricted the excess flow enough to raise the pressure on both the priority flow and excess flow enough to overcome the sticky cylinder.

You helped the problem when you turned down the priority flow because the reduced flow caused smaller pressure losses in the fittings, hoses, valve, etc. And I suspect you did not have a load in the bucket, so these flow losses were the primary source of pressure in the circuit; therefore even a small reduction in them would produce a noticeable result. If the bucket had a heavy load most of the pressure would have come from the load and any reduction in pressure due to lower flow would have been relatively very small and probably not noticeable.

The main effect (in addition to loading your engine more than necessary) is that the temperature of the hydraulic fluid will increase substantially during heavy work. The 8gpm flow through the priority curcuit is doing useful work by moving the cylinders. The additional 8gpm through the excess flow circuit is doing no useful work; it releases its energy by heating up the fluid as the pressure drops across the excess flow port. Temperature increases about 1 deg F for each 140psi of pressure drop. For example, suppose you have a heavy load in the loader that requires 2,000psig to lift. During that lift the priority flow valve, in order to keep the 8gpm you programmed (by adjusting the spring pressure) flowing through the priority flow circuit the priority valve spool shifts to block the excess flow just enough to keep the same 2,000psig pressure in the excess flow. But as soon as that excess flow leaves the priority valve its pressure drops to practically zero; thus that fluid has a 2,000psig pressure drop that does no useful work. The temperature of the fluid that flows through the excess circuit during the lift cycle increases by 1deg F for each 140psi of temperature drop. That means that fluid temperature increased by about 14deg F. To make the math easy, suppose the lift cycle lasted 7 seconds, which is about 1/8 minute; at 8gpm, one gallon of fluid passed through the excess flow circuit during the lift and its temperature was increased by 14 deg F.

The temperature increase in the hydraulic fluid volume as a whole will depend, of course, on the pressure drop which in turn depends on the load on the FEL, and on the length of time the loader works. We know nothing about the size of your hydraulic reservoir or any oil coolers you may have, so it is not possible to predict how much fluid heating may occur.

If it were me I would ignore the engine loading as a necessary by-product of shifting from two pumps to a single pump and keep an eye on hydraulic fluid temperatures. Even a valve body or pump too hot to touch does not indicate a problem. Quality hydraulic fluids will maintain adequate viscosity to protect moving parts and retain a reasonable service live at temperatures of at least 165deg F.

Please keep us posted on how things turn out.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly #22  
Farmer ford,
excellent reply and I believe 100% correct.

JD4310:

To eliminate the engine loading at heat generation caused by the larger pump and priority flow control you could use a double pump system. Each pump would feed a function and only that function would be under pressure. This is what is commonly used on CUT's one pump for steering and cooling, the other for FEL & 3PH.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly #23  
JD4310man:

I think the engine loading is caused by the flow divider. I assume priority flow is to the FEL valve. Assume your pump is producing 16 gpm and you have the flow divider set to provide an 8gpm priority flow to the loader valve. The flow divider sends the first 8gpm to the loader and the excess of 8gpm in this case to the other valve (you never said what that valve was, but I assume three point hitch; it doesn't really matter).

When the pump flow enters the flow divider it can take one of two paths: out the priority flow port or out the excess port. The flow divider works by forcing 8gpm to flow out of the priority flow port regardless of the pressure in that port; it does that by partially blocking the flow out of the excess port. If the FEL valve is in neutral there is very little pressure in the priority flow port because the only resistance to flow comes from losses inside the FEL valve, fittings, hoses, etc.; the spring loaded spool in the priority flow valve restricts the excess flow path only enough to cause 8gpm to flow through the priority port. But suppose you lift the FEL with a heavy load in the bucker that requires 500psig of pressure in the lift cylinders to move the load as fast as you want; that is the 8gpm of priority flow you want from the priority flow valve must over come 500psig of resistance in order to flow into the lift cylinder. The priority flow valve makes the 8gpm keep flowing out of the priority port, despite the fact that it now has to have at least 500psig of pressure, by restricting the flow in the excess port until it is also under 500psig of pressure. The spool in the priority flow valve shifts to partially block the excess flow port until the pressure in the excess flow port and priority flow port are the same; and the spring in the priority flow valve (that you adjusted) determines how much of the flow goes to the priority flow port when those pressures are equal.

Put simply, when you shift the loader valve to send fluid to the loader cylinders you increase the pressure in not only the loader circuit (the priority flow circuit), you also increase pressure to the same level in the excess flow circuit. In the above example, it is not only the 8gpm going to the FEL valve that requires 500psig pressure from the pump, it is also the 8gpm that is passing through the excess flow circuit. So, in your prior two pump set up you were only loading the FEL pump with 500psig when you worked the loader; now in effect you are loading "both" pumps.

Anything increasing the pressure in the priority flow circuit will aggravate the problem; fittings that are too small or with flow restrictors will increase the resistance in the FEL circuit and in turn increase the pressure in both the priority flow port and excess flow port.

The effect was most noticeable in regenerative mode on the bucket for two reasons. First, the nature of the regenerative circuit itself. The faster movement of the cylinder in regenerative comes from redirecting the exhaust flow from the cylinder from the tank to the other cylinder port. For example, if the cylinder to rod area ratio is such that the cylinder moves twice as fast, the cost is that it takes twice as much pump pressure to overcome resistance in the cylinder. Of course, when the bucket is being dumped and the load pulls it down rapidly, there is little if any resistance in the cylinder and and therefore little extra pressure on the pump. Second, your sticky cylinder increased the resistance even when dumping the cylinder to the point that the pump had to produce pressure to make it move. And it had to produce twice the normal pressure because of the regenerative feature. Of course, the effect of that increased pressured was reflected all the way back to the priority valve, which restricted the excess flow enough to raise the pressure on both the priority flow and excess flow enough to overcome the sticky cylinder.

You helped the problem when you turned down the priority flow because the reduced flow caused smaller pressure losses in the fittings, hoses, valve, etc. And I suspect you did not have a load in the bucket, so these flow losses were the primary source of pressure in the circuit; therefore even a small reduction in them would produce a noticeable result. If the bucket had a heavy load most of the pressure would have come from the load and any reduction in pressure due to lower flow would have been relatively very small and probably not noticeable.

The main effect (in addition to loading your engine more than necessary) is that the temperature of the hydraulic fluid will increase substantially during heavy work. The 8gpm flow through the priority curcuit is doing useful work by moving the cylinders. The additional 8gpm through the excess flow circuit is doing no useful work; it releases its energy by heating up the fluid as the pressure drops across the excess flow port. Temperature increases about 1 deg F for each 140psi of pressure drop. For example, suppose you have a heavy load in the loader that requires 2,000psig to lift. During that lift the priority flow valve, in order to keep the 8gpm you programmed (by adjusting the spring pressure) flowing through the priority flow circuit the priority valve spool shifts to block the excess flow just enough to keep the same 2,000psig pressure in the excess flow. But as soon as that excess flow leaves the priority valve its pressure drops to practically zero; thus that fluid has a 2,000psig pressure drop that does no useful work. The temperature of the fluid that flows through the excess circuit during the lift cycle increases by 1deg F for each 140psi of temperature drop. That means that fluid temperature increased by about 14deg F. To make the math easy, suppose the lift cycle lasted 7 seconds, which is about 1/8 minute; at 8gpm, one gallon of fluid passed through the excess flow circuit during the lift and its temperature was increased by 14 deg F.

The temperature increase in the hydraulic fluid volume as a whole will depend, of course, on the pressure drop which in turn depends on the load on the FEL, and on the length of time the loader works. We know nothing about the size of your hydraulic reservoir or any oil coolers you may have, so it is not possible to predict how much fluid heating may occur.

If it were me I would ignore the engine loading as a necessary by-product of shifting from two pumps to a single pump and keep an eye on hydraulic fluid temperatures. Even a valve body or pump too hot to touch does not indicate a problem. Quality hydraulic fluids will maintain adequate viscosity to protect moving parts and retain a reasonable service live at temperatures of at least 165deg F.

Please keep us posted on how things turn out.

I believe priority flow is always to the steering circuit for safety reasons.

If the priority flow is adjustable, then you set it to the response you want from the steering, be it fast or slow.

Just don't think it has anything to do with the loader valve, as a lot of other tractors have flow dividers, and not the loader problems.

If you have 10 GPM tractor flow, and you adjust the steering to 3 GPM's, then you have 7 GPM's for the attachments, and that circuit should operate independent of the other hyd circuit.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly
  • Thread Starter
#24  
J_J, Im not sure how much flow is coming out of the flow divider as it is infinitely variable flow between 2 and 12 gpm. The Hatz is the 2G40 diesel engine. rated at 23 hp at 3000 rpm. I thought by using the flow divider that it would split the 21 gpm pump out put in to 14 and 7 gpm. So when im using the track drive at 14gpm it would have enough power. The hose on the left of the top valve is coming from the adjustable flow divider. The blue hose coming out of the right side of the top valve, is feeding the lower auxiliary valve. I have the Brand power beyond plug, it is not currently hooked up. Anyway The machine doesn't do too bad with this pump, its the loader function that is giving me the fit.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly
  • Thread Starter
#25  
Farmerford: I went with a single pump system as I changed from the factory Kohler gas with two pump system to a Hatz diesel. The diesel is a larger engine and I didnt have a way or the space to power two pumps like the factory setup. So the solution to me was a larger single pump and the use of a flow divider. So far its working good, the track drive works well and the up and down function of the loader works well. I replaced seals on the one bucket cylinder and Had problems with the seals causing friction on the cylinder. I think that this is my cause of strain on the system. The 4800 Magnatrac model utilized a single pump system to run everything like im doing here. It only had a 12 gpm pump and resulted in very slow machine travel speed. However im sure that all 12 gpm was not being fed to the attachment valve. Is a flow divider a proper thing to use in this type of application?
 

Attachments

  • 100_3025.JPG
    100_3025.JPG
    824.9 KB · Views: 211
  • 100_3024.JPG
    100_3024.JPG
    758 KB · Views: 254
  • 100_3016.JPG
    100_3016.JPG
    707.8 KB · Views: 207
  • 100_3017.JPG
    100_3017.JPG
    747.6 KB · Views: 163
   / New loader valve not working properly #26  
How is the 7 GPM used? I assumed steering, but the track drive does the steering.

Are you using one or two hyd motors to drive the tracks?

Are you using the 14 GPM for the track drive and letting the 7 go to tank?

If you are using the 14 GPM at 2000 psi, that takes about 19 HP.

Why are you limiting the pressure to 2000 psi?

As I said before I don't believe you have enough HP to run the pump to max.

Logic says you should be using the PB to feed the next valve, and run all the OUT lines to tank.

What is the purpose of the SA circuit in the stacked valve?
 
   / New loader valve not working properly #27  
21 GPM @ 1650 PSI = 23 HP This allowing for hydraulic system to 85% efficient


Like farmerford stated: ALL of the oil being pumped by a single pump will be at whatever the max load requirement is.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly
  • Thread Starter
#28  
The 7 gpm is used to run the loader and attachments. The 14 gpm is used to run two gerotor motors that use a tandem chain reduction box. The motors are factory. Only the loader and stack valves are set at 2000 psi. I believe the drive motor circuit is set at 3000 psi. The (SA circuit) on the stack valve is used to rout implement hydraulic flow to the drive motor valve to act as an overdrive. It basically diverts all pump flow to the drive system. I am going to reinstall the power beyond equipment to system. I was only experamenting running without the PB plug and hose.
 
   / New loader valve not working properly #29  
Is this crazy or what? I do believe even our worthless U.S. Congress is better suited to solve problems than this crew. I know I'm opening myself up to a blast of vitriol here, but this sounds like a lot of bickering back and forth about pressures and flows, priorities and minorities, or what have you. Each voice trying to outsolve the others. I'm no engineer, but if I were designing something of this sort, I would have given ten minutes more thought to the expected flow requirements of each system and looked for a double or triple stack pump. Each section matched to requirements of one particular system without all the crossovers and priorities. Just my opinion, mind you. Now for the list of reasons why I'm wrong.....
 
   / New loader valve not working properly #30  
JD4310man:

That's nice looking work you are doing on the Struck. Looks very clean and well laid out; mine often looks like a bed of snakes somehow connected with a variety of fittings and adapters I happened to find in the corner.

I would have done the new engine exactly like you did, given that the original tandem pumps could not be used. I have two Prince flow dividers on projects I have made. The only difference is that on one of them I used what is sometimes called a hydraulic motor speed control because the flow adjustment bolt is replaced by a short lever that can be moved by hand; it does the same thing as the priority flow valve because the flow is pressure compensated; when pressure increases in the priority flow circuit the spool shifts to further restrict the passage for excess flow and thereby equalize pressure in both circuits. With the lever I can adjust the priority on the go without wrenches.

You have encountered and handled properly in my opinion the main drawback to a fixed displacement pump and the open circuit valves that it necessitates; to divide the flow you have to put both streams under the same pressure. But in most cases the greatly reduced cost of a gear or vane type fixed displacement pump compared to a variable displacement pump and the associated automated displacement control hardware (and now software) is worth the disadvantage of the inefficient way you have to split the flow.

The mechanical flow divider uses two or more gear pumps/motors mechanically connected through their shafts and does not require pressurization of the other flow. If the motors have the same displacement, then when the single input stream from the pump reaches the "Y" at the motors , one half must flow through each motor because the mechanical connection of the motor shafts forces them to turn at the same speed. But these types of mechanical flow dividers are several times the cost of the spool type, substantially more bulky, and have the disadvantage that the pressure in one out circuit can be twice that in the pump circuit because of the mechanically connected motors, so relief valves are required in each out port.


Spool type directional control valves in an open center system, when the spool is only partially shifted or "feathered", are dividing the pump flow into two parts; the part doing work is directed to the hydraulic cylinder via the work ports and the part of the pump flow not directed to the cylinder flows through the valve body to the tank. But inside the valve body the part passing to the tank is under the same pressure as the part going to the cylinder; the tank flow undergoes the same kind of pressure drop in the valve as the excess flow experiences in the priority flow valve.

Please send us pictures of the whole machine.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

Pair of New 700/40-225 Alliance Tires with Rims (A55301)
Pair of New...
2018 Ford Fusion Hybird (A53424)
2018 Ford Fusion...
2011 John Deere 5075 4WD Agricultural Tractor (A52377)
2011 John Deere...
2000 Mercedes-Benz S-Class Sedan (A55758)
2000 Mercedes-Benz...
UNUSED IRANCH IRMC HIGH END ELECTRIC MASSAGE CHAIR (A54757)
UNUSED IRANCH IRMC...
2019 Energreen EVO 40 Robotic Tracked Flail Mower (A55218)
2019 Energreen EVO...
 
Top