New LS MT342 loader issues

/ New LS MT342 loader issues #21  
I looked at my loader line's this weekend and I have to correct myself. The quick connects at the loader are 3/8" (6600 series) and and then it is 1/4" hose and tubing from there. So the restrictions will be the loader hoses and lines.

A pump that will put out approximately 7-7.5 GPM, quick connects rated at 6 GPM and 1/4" hoses rated, highly marginal, at 3-4 GPM.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues
  • Thread Starter
#22  
I looked at my loader line's this weekend and I have to correct myself. The quick connects at the loader are 3/8" (6600 series) and and then it is 1/4" hose and tubing from there. So the restrictions will be the loader hoses and lines.

A pump that will put out approximately 7-7.5 GPM, quick connects rated at 6 GPM and 1/4" hoses rated, highly marginal, at 3-4 GPM.

I wonder why they went with 1/4? Has anyone looked at a New Holland tractor of the same size? They are LS tractors but New Holland has their own loader. I will have to see if I can locate one and see what size lines they use?
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #23  
I wonder why they went with 1/4? Has anyone looked at a New Holland tractor of the same size? They are LS tractors but New Holland has their own loader. I will have to see if I can locate one and see what size lines they use?
I can tell you, because my old one was a New Holland and that loader used 1/2" hose and 1/2" OD tubing. It used the same 3/8" quick connects (6600 series).
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues
  • Thread Starter
#24  
Would larger hose speed up loader? Reduce lift capacity?
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #25  
It would speed it up but shouldn't impact lift capabilities.

If the 1/4" lines are causing a pressure drop due to restrictions then you could see some gain in capabilities by using the larger lines. Don't suspect it would be that large of a change.

New Holland also used smaller diameter cylinders than LS. That would also impact cycle times as well.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #26  
I wonder why they went with 1/4?...

I believe I read in another thread that doing this should help reduce the severity of the floppy bucket syndrome some complained about.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #27  
I believe I read in another thread that doing this should help reduce the severity of the floppy bucket syndrome some complained about.
Yep. Couple different ways they could have addressed that issue. They chose smaller lines restricting the flow. But there are trade-offs with different methods
 

Marketplace Items

New/Unused Landhonor 50 Ton Capacity Hydraulic Shop Press (A61166)
New/Unused...
2020 CHEVROLET SILVERADO CREW CAB TRUCK (A63276)
2020 CHEVROLET...
2016 Isuzu NRR 18ft. Flatbed Truck (A61568)
2016 Isuzu NRR...
2017 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA 125 6X4 T/A SLEEPER TRUCK TRACTOR (A59908)
2017 FREIGHTLINER...
JOHN DEERE 6140M TRACTOR (A62130)
JOHN DEERE 6140M...
2025 X39 Hydraulic Trencher Skid Steer Attachment (A61567)
2025 X39 Hydraulic...
 
Top