kenmac
Super Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2005
- Messages
- 9,837
- Location
- The Heart of Dixie
- Tractor
- McCormick CX105 Kubota MX 5100 HST, Kubota ZD1021, Kawsaki Mule 4010 trans 4x4
Humm.., No answer . /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif
kenmac said:Welcome John, good post. Can you answer my question ? Why does the repair shop / your supplier in vietnam roll back/ reset the H.R. meters on these tractors ? Is the prospective buyer aware that the HR. meters have been rolled back / reset on these tractors ?
thanks
kenmac said:Welcome John, good post. Can you answer my question ? Why does the repair shop / your supplier in vietnam roll back/ reset the H.R. meters on these tractors ? Is the prospective buyer aware that the HR. meters have been rolled back / reset on these tractors ?
thanks
BruceR said:John, Welcome to TBN.
It is good to see you stand behind your product. An open forum is no good unless you have at least two sides to the story. Sounds like you went above and beyond in supporting Art.
I do get on my soapbox about recons. I first perused your site when I was researching Yanmars prior to my purchase of my 2000B. When I saw the standard litany of “new” parts in all your tractors, I wrote your firm off as just another one to stay away from. If I was wrong to lump you in there then I apologize, you may be one of the good guys, but I still think you were misleading your customers on what they were buying. By the way, nice look to your new site.
It seems my post was most offensive to you as I was quoted several times. You had a warranty statement posted on your site and I was quoting from it for the most part. You say that you wanted it signed or the warranty was void. Why would it get your hackles up if someone then points this out? I am one of the few that reads the fine print. Why is it there if it doesn’t mean anything? Wasn’t there that little fine print statement “as needed” under your list of pistons, rings, clutch, etc. that was replaced in all your tractors?
Your warranty statement said it covered the above items only. Four wheel drive was not on that list. I consider it part of the drive train, but had no way of knowing you consider it transmission.
It is true that I need to temper what I say in a public forum. I forget sometimes and write as if I am speaking to an individual. A few months ago I replied honestly when asked my opinion of a publication and felt badly afterward. I should have replied in a PM; but then, I think, what good is a public forum if we are all worried about being politically correct and not stepping on anybodies toes? I did wonder why we never heard from anyone in the recon end of things, It’s good that you are busy. I am too. Life is like that. There is a reason that the majority of my posts are so early in the morning. I don’t believe I said anything libelous, but if you feel I did, then we can discuss that further. Sure, what is posted and read may affect buying decisions, just a glossy website claiming that every moving part in an engine has been replaced with new parts can affect buying decisions. Should that be labeled deceptive trade practice?
I don’t mean to come off as being combative. I am glad that you chose to post here and hope you do in the future.
Bruce