Threepoint
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Messages
- 2,233
- Location
- No. VA
- Tractor
- Kubota B2150HST w/ LA350 loader, Kubota GF1800 HST, Kioti CK3510SE HST w/ KL4030 loader, Kioti NX4510HST/cab w/ KL6010 loader
The cab on a Kubota L5460 will add about 800 pounds, with most of the weight over the rear tires.
That is enough. I would inflate rear tires with air, the simplest option.
Maintaining traction is usually only an issue with ground engagement work. The only moderately demanding ground engagement work you foresee is pulling a Box Blade. The 800 pound cab will put sufficient weight on the rear tires to maintain traction driven by 56-horsepower gross.
The rear R4 tires on the Grand Ls are, unusually, on two part wheels. L5460 rear wheels/tires can be spread to any of three width increments: 53.5", 59.4" or 59.1" tread width. Tread width is from CENTER of one rear tire to CENTER of other rear tire. Tread width is published because tire suppliers change tire configurations but tread width is always tread width.
Spreading the rear wheel/tire stance increases tractor stability more than any other individual option. Consider rear wheel spread first.
Determine max outside to outside tire spread from dealer, based on current Kubota tire offering. (Or inquire here via dedicated new thread.) Buy a 10' stick of 1-1/4" PVC pipe. Cut pipe at max tire width. Mark narrower widths on pipe. Walk around your land, comparing pipe to tree spreads, gates, etc. I did this exercise. It determined I needed a 60" wide tractor. A tractor 66" wide would have been too constraining.
I have air in the tires of my open station Kubota 'Grand L' L3560. I can pull a full Rollover Box Blade uphill in HST/LOW.
With due respect, Jeff, I could not disagree more strongly with this advice. Yes, almost all of it.
I agree that mounting the rear tires in their widest stance is great, if buck12's R4 rims can be set wider, as the R1 rims can. But first double check the resulting overall width, sidewall to sidewall, to know what it will mean hauling wise. I don't know with that model, but he should know in advance if doing this will then require a rollback or a deck-over trailer to transport. If may also make a difference in the width of rear implements needed to cover the tracks. E.g., with an angled rear blade. Not a big deal, but good to consider in advance.
As for the type of fill, beet juice is up to 30 percent heavier than an antifreeze mix the dealer proposes (make sure it's non-toxic propylene glycol, not ethylene glycol!), so gives more ballast. But either is much better than air, and neither one is corrosive to the rims. Calcium Chloride (CC) is a totally different matter, but buck12's dealer hasn't suggested it. The beet juice is costlier for the dealer, assuming buck12's dealer is willing to source and use it (not everyone is, based on my personal experience).