Sincere question.
The only two candidates are women applying for the same position. Education, work history, training and experience are identical between both canidates.
Which canidate do you go with and why?
Good gravy man, are you daft? Mimi gets the job!
But seriously, never had those extremes to deal with.
What we did at my last job was keep a huge stack of job applications in a drawer. Every time we got a new one, we'd put it at the back of the drawer. Every time we needed to hire someone, we pulled the application from the front and gave them a call.
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
When we got someone that said yes, we'd bing em in for an interview. If they passed muster with qualifications, they were hired regardless of what they looked like. If not:
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
I know it's been 2 years, but still interested in a job? Nope? Thanks.
Next
And so on.
The only time we ran into trouble was when HR took over applicants through on-line process. Then they'd send us 5 interviewees. THAT's when you run into trouble because you have to pick. Even with that, if there's a tie, first one that got the application in wins.
Easy peasy and able to defend in court.