We heat entirely with wood. We have an Osburn stove that is supposed to heat about 2,200 sf but we have 2,450 sf. But instead of 8 ft we have 10 ft ceilings so there is more house than stove. AND we have lots of big windows aka holes in the walls. They are energy efficient windows and they do no leak air but they still are holes in the walls.
The stove is on one side of the house and we have a fairly open floor plan so the heat from the stove moves very quickly to the back of the house.
The stove does keep are house very comfortable most of the time. The exception is when the temps get into the teens and the highs stay in the 20's or low 30's on cloudy days. We have passive solar heating so lack of sun will keep the house cooler. But given those parameters the stove keeps the house very warm for most of the time. A second stove would be nice but we cannot justify the cost since we would only need it for a couple of weeks a year.
In your floor plan if you close the bedroom doors any heat flow is going to be stopped. This is true in our house as well. Our ceiling are flat, not cathedral ceiling to trap the air. If you have flat ceilings it looks like the heat will flow to the other side of the house but those back rooms are still going to be colder than the rest of the house unless you get a much bigger stove vs house size.
We do not like using the ceiling fans to mix the air. The slight movement of air makes us feel colder. But if you have the fans try them in reverse and see what happens.
Tis better to have the chimney stay inside the envelope of the house for as far as possible to draft easily. I think the rule is that the chimney should NOT have more than 180 degrees worth of turns.
You also need or should have an outside source of combustion air. We have a six inch PVC pipe that runs under the floor and pops up behind the stove. If the stove is burning you can feel the air being sucked into the house by the stove. But we do not feel the cold air since it is either used up by the stove or heated by the stove. There are adapters that can go through the wall to bring in combustion air. Some stoves have connections for combustion air.
Money wise I am guessing we save a $100-150 a month by heating with wood. If we had to pay for the wood I am not sure it would be worth the cost. In our case we save quite a bit of money burning wood. Not only the heating savings but we always have trees to clean up. If I had to pay someone to take out the down trees that would be big dollars. We already had a great chain saw and tractor. The only tool we have specifically for burning wood is the hydraulic splitter to split wood. It paid for itself quickly.
With just me cutting the wood into round and splitting I figure it takes me about 8-10 hours and at most $15-20. I need the exercise so splitting the wood is just a bonus. Saving money and burning calories.
If I had to pay for the wood and I did not have our own downed/dead trees to clean up I do not think burning wood would be worth the money.
We lost power for 2-3 hours twice of the holidays. Sure was nice having a nice warm house even if the lights were out. :thumbsup:
Later,
Dan