I found that to be an interesting operational feature as well... and I found myself wondering if it would be a more helpful or not-so-helpful feature on my own machine. The notion of being able to adjust your load while under a near constant pinching force is kind of interesting... but at what price in terms of reduced pinching power? And yet it sounds from his description like this "feature" can be defeated, when necessary or desired, simply by applying pressure to both sides at the same time. Sure wish I had more info on this... but I don't think I should let it affect my cylinder sizing criteria... still looking like 2.75" based on all the factors previously discussed.dfkrug said:Based on your description, Woods must have designed for similar net forces applied by the thumb and bkt, then added a relief valve to each circuit so they would retract under opposing pressure. Otherwise opposing pressure would have exceeded the pressure limits of the cylinders. I find it a bit surprising that the thumb can push the bkt back. I wonder what pressures they are seeing... They also may have INTENDED the user to be able to push either back by the other so he could position his load. The problem I see here is only if a relief in the bkt circuit is set lower than max press, which limits your digging capability. A tradeoff.
Dougster