ponytug
Super Member
Sure; our house is in trees, with lots of obstructions, so Starlink is not likely to work well at the house. After lots of trial and error, the nearest place where Starlink is predicted to work well by the Starlink app is a roof on an outbuilding about 250' away. That location would be a real problem to run fiber optic to/from, including running under a large paved area, two retaining walls, and missing buried power, water, and septic lines. Running copper wire would be worse, as that distance is pushing the upper limit of Ethernet (100m).For someone who is not knowledgeable about networking, can you explain the radio point to point as it relates to using Starlink?
So, that brings us to using radios, specifically point to point radios from Ubiquiti that can support the Starlink bandwidth. (Ethernet goes in at one antenna comes out at the other, with something like 850Mbit/s full duplex between them for 1.7Gbit/s overall. Ubiquiti Gigabeams LR.) Other than having to put up antenna mounts at both ends, and needing to align the antennas, it is actually pretty straightforward. The Ubiquiti Gigabeam antennas have an app that when the antennas are powered on enables you to see the receiving power of the remote antenna, so you can tweak the one you are at until the far antenna is at a maximum, and then repeat at the other end. I would recommend getting adhesive rubber mastic patches for between the antenna mount and the house to seal the screws/bolts. Much better than caulking. Our set up is such that the house point to point antenna is aimed more or less at the Starlink antenna site due to geometry, so I used the long range version of the Gigabeams which have a narrow RF beam because there was some concern about what frequencies Starlink might be using and I wanted not to light up the Starlink dish with extra local radio frequency noise.
So, I now have a high speed link to the horse stalls. Yeah, not really needed.
All the best,
Peter