Tmobile is supposed to take over a Sprint tower near me next July. *If* that happens, *if* it supplies me with 5G, I won't proceed with Starlink. Yep, two "ifs" together, aahhh.
For me, the issue is whether to invest $500+/- in a system that will continue to increase in monthly price over time. In other words, in the future, would I be happy with Starlink at $200, $250, or $300/mo?
If I install Starlink, I'll do so presuming the monthly fees, over time, will be far above what they currently are. I believe the recent price increase is only one of many to come.
Similar to Starlink, (rural subsidy from the govt), I once bought real property subsidized by a developer. HOA fees were $170/mo, presuming to go down once reaching full "build out" of the project. But after full build out, HOA fees increased to $395 per month. Removing the subsidy caused the price to more than double.
Ground based providers install a tower, some fiber, and wireless equipment. Once built out, on-going costs are fairly low. To contrast, Starlink's satellites degrade orbit, requiring recurring space launches just to keep the system functional. What is the cost of that?
I think everyone knows, or believes, Starlink is selling equipment and services below cost right now. So the question is: what will the price be once below-cost operation is abandoned, and the subsidies are gone, and the system is built out?
Starlink marketing and accounting folks know what numbers are needed to operate the system at a profit. But they're not talking. If I had to guess, I'd guess its probably double the monthly fees which are being billed today.