dangerdoc
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 354
Rivco said:I agree with you 100% Phil. They should be concerned about the safety of the person operating their equipment and not about property damage.I reversed my cutter blade and I have never changed it back. I'm concerned and responsible for my own safety, and I have liability insurance to cover property damage and injury to others.
Sorry for the late post.
They may be hoping that you modify the equipement. If you modify the equipement, you take full responsibility for any bad outcome. They have the perfectly valid legal defense that you defeated the safety engineering.
Now here is the scary part. Your liability insurance also has the same defense and can elect not to cover incurred damages.
If that were not scary enough, law enforcement could look at such modifications as passing beyond negligence and entering the area of willfull harm or damage.
Okay, I do see the glass as half empty.