urbanist said:
Salesmen I have met in New England have all pushed the simple bucket attachment, stating that the exuberant cost and heavy weight of the combo bucket makes the item not an ideal choice.
maybe i understated it - it is almost impossible to source a bucket here that is not a 4 in 1.
salesmen would want you to buy something that is of limited use so they can then sell you another bit to do the job...
i have a fairly 'heavy' 4 in 1 - which i've used to pick up a telegraph pole - 40 feet of good aussie hardwood about 16" on diameter. i don't reckon i'd gain anything by having a conventional bucket but i know i'd lose a lot in flexibility... its pretty amazing what it'll grab, it does struggle picking up a hardwood log about 3ft in diameter but if you bite hard enough it'll do it.
the teeth are handy tho not as good as a ripper.
yesterday i got stuck coming up a wet slope - i used the bucket opening to push myself out backwards.
when i want to carry more of things like firewood i open the bucket a bit first - which gives me more capacity.
when i load the bucket if the material is sticky aka clay sort of stuff then i just dive in and grab a bucketful whereas a conventional drive in and scoop approach does not work effectively.
and as for backblading, try it with an open 4 in 1 and you'll look askance at a conv bucket thereon...
and so on....
we don't have any snow to deal with, only possible use i could see for a conv bucket locally is pure loading work but then i'd buy a dedicated wheel loader if that was all i wanted...
grapples are almost exclusively used only by the demolition boys here...