</font><font color="blue" class="small">( None of the implements or attachments I use or plan to use would be affected by that small increase in Hp (achieved with turbo aspiration)
The '48 lists a higher capacity hydro pump (dont understand this) )</font>
I guess the dollars are more of an issue than I thought. I'm reminded of a quote by John Miller III, who used to be a prolific poster and expert. One of his favorite sayings was (paraphrased here) that over the life of a tractor, a couple thousand bucks ain't spit. /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif Now, I'm not saying that, but I do think there will be many less TC48s sold than TC55s. I also think if NH had only had the TC55, nobody would complain. But hey... I'm looking at this from the aspect of a company planning to market a product. I just think the TC48 will be harder to sell than the TC55. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
I noticed you don't have a loader listed in your profile and none of your 3PH implements require the 3,500# lift capacity of the Class IVs. I'm curious why you didn't buy a gear TC45 and save even more money?
I noticed the puzzling difference in the hydraulic specs the first time I saw data on the two new tractors. Could the ESS transmission use some of the hydraulic flow for control power? That's the only thing that makes sense to me. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif